Developing clinical supervision research through reasoned analogies with therapy

Abstract

Something about the increasingly important business of clinical supervision 'does not compute' (Watkins, 1997, p. 604). The paradox is that supervision has never been so strongly endorsed as the mainstay of professional development (in both initial training and CPD), yet we know so surprisingly little about it (Ellis, Ladany, Krengel, & Schult, 1996). Consequently, we tend to base our supervision on how we ourselves were supervised, or on our approach to therapy (Falender and Shafranske, 2005). As part of the rationale for a research programme intended to address this paradox, a systematic analogy is drawn between therapy and supervision, with clinical psychology taken as an example. This indicates how therapy and supervision overlap, allowing key parallels to be defined, such as the shared emphasis on a problem-solving approach, founded on a working alliance. Of particular potential value, this can lead to the identification of relevant models and methodologies that have shown promise in the relatively sophisticated therapy literature, and which might therefore aid research into supervision. Examples are provided and implications drawn for future attempts at drawing promising analogies and for developing research into clinical supervision. Copyright

Getting to the Heart of Clinical Supervision: A Theoretical Review of the Role of Emotions in Professional Development

“…As suggested earlier, therapy and supervision overlap when it comes to alliance (Liese and Beck, 1997;Milne, 2006), and so not surprisingly research indicates that alliance is also an important factor for successful supervision, with some researchers even suggesting that it is the most important aspect of supervision (Ladany, Friedlander and Nelson, 2005;Reichelt and Skjerve, 2002).…”

A Rationale for Evidence-Based Clinical Supervision

“…This includes drawing systematic analogies with related literatures (e.g. working alliances in therapy : Milne 2006); using the 'best-evidence synthesis' approach when reviewing the supervision literature (i.e. focussing on the most promising research findings: e.g.…”

Beyond the “Acid Test”: A Conceptual Review and Reformulation of Outcome Evaluation in Clinical Supervision

“…I propose to do this by drawing, as appropriate, on related literatures, following Lambert and Ogles (1997) and Milne (2006). Here I will extend this reasoning by turning for guidance to a wider sample of relevant literatures: those of staff development, service evaluation, applied research, and therapy.…”