2018
DOI: 10.1080/09593969.2018.1462235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing CSR in retail–supplier relationships: a stakeholder interaction approach

Abstract: The purpose of this research is to explore how a stakeholder interaction perspective can add to the understanding of the dynamics of the process of corporate social responsibility (CSR) development in retail buyer-supplier relationships. Firstly, we find that interaction with suppliers and other stakeholders seems to have a pivotal role in the development towards sustainable retail supply chains. Secondly, and by addressing the phases of initiation, implementation and maturation of CSR development, we find tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(107 reference statements)
2
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interest on corporate social responsibility (CSR) had widely increased in the past decades (Bolton and Mattila, 2015;Hultman and Elg, 2018). Companies around the world attempt to respond to the pressure from a set of stakeholders, including governments, suppliers, communities and customers (Kim et al, 2014;Torres et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interest on corporate social responsibility (CSR) had widely increased in the past decades (Bolton and Mattila, 2015;Hultman and Elg, 2018). Companies around the world attempt to respond to the pressure from a set of stakeholders, including governments, suppliers, communities and customers (Kim et al, 2014;Torres et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the distinctive features of the buyer in this study compared to previous literature is its capacity to juggle between the compliance and commitment approach (Hultman and Elg 2016; Locke et al . 2009; Lund‐Thomsen and Lindgreen 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Alternatively, through a commitment‐oriented approach, buyers may develop collaborations/partnerships, exchange information, provide assistance and build capacity of suppliers (Alexander 2019; Hultman and Elg 2016; Locke et al . 2009; Lund‐Thomsen and Lindgreen 2014, 2018).…”
Section: Social Dialogue In Global Value Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of research on sustainability in retail had a time lag of about ten years in comparison to other sustainability-connected research, while it seems to have received more attention in retail management practice (Wiese et al 2012). Over the years and different sectors, topics and geographical scopes of retail (i.e., large U.K. listed retailers like Kingfisher, Marks and Spencer and Next (Keay and Iqbal 2018)) have been covered by researchers, including sustainability of customer preferences and attitudes (Strähle and Müller 2016;Naidoo and Gasparatos 2018;Dabija and Băbuţ 2019), the impact of retail marketing instruments on store choice, store image and/or store patronage in various retail sectors Băbuţ 2014, 2019), applying the generational perspective in retail (Dabija et al 2018(Dabija et al , 2020 but also analyzing stakeholder relationships in retail (Hultman and Elg 2018;Ruiz-Real et al 2018;Naidoo and Gasparatos 2018).…”
Section: Sustainable Crowdfundingmentioning
confidence: 99%