2010
DOI: 10.21432/t20p4d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing Deep Understanding and Literacy while Addressing a Gender-Based Literacy Gap

Abstract: Online discourse from a class of 22 students (11 boys and 11 girls) was analysed to assess advances in conceptual understanding and literacy. The students worked over a two--year period (Grades 3--4), during which they contributed notes to an online Knowledge Building environment-Knowledge Forum®. Contributions revealed that both boys and girls produced a substantial amount of text and graphics, and that their written texts incorporated an increasing proportion of less--frequent, advanced words, including acad… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All students benefit from rigorous and rich learning experiences. When appropriately designed, even students who have previously performed at low levels can simultaneously attain foundational skills as they engage in “authentic intellectual work” (Newmann et al, 2001: 13) that requires higher levels of cognition (Scardamalia & Bereiter, 2022; Y. Sun et al, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical and Empirical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All students benefit from rigorous and rich learning experiences. When appropriately designed, even students who have previously performed at low levels can simultaneously attain foundational skills as they engage in “authentic intellectual work” (Newmann et al, 2001: 13) that requires higher levels of cognition (Scardamalia & Bereiter, 2022; Y. Sun et al, 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical and Empirical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea that textual, dialogic, graphical, scientific, and other literacies are advanced as by--products of Knowledge Building pedagogy and technology is supported by a number of recent studies (Sun, Zhang, & Scardamalia, 2010a, 2010bZhang & Sun, in press) showing that students make impressive gains in understanding core content areas as well as in vocabulary, reading, inquiry, and other 21st century competencies.…”
Section: Graphical Literacy As a By-product Of Knowledge Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In favor of the timing pattern of presenting questions during the presentation. Garner, 2007;Barron & Darling & Hammaond, 2008;Oakes & Star & Paideya, 2008;Sookrajh, 2010;Sun & Zhang & Scardamalia, 2010;Anderson, et al, 2010;McConnell & Parker & Eberhardt, 2013…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%