2020
DOI: 10.1177/1362168820913539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing EFL students’ pragmatic competence: The case of compliment responses

Abstract: This study investigated the effect of consciousness-raising instruction and corpus-based instruction on EFL (English as a foreign language) students’ development of compliment responses. It employed a quasi-experimental design with 136 EFL university students divided between three groups: control, consciousness-raising, and corpus groups. A discourse completion test (DCT) was used as a pre- and post-test with all the groups to investigate any significant differences between them. Further, a questionnaire with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In regards to assessment of the methodology, the post-test data results provided further evidence for pedagogical intervention being an effective tool in enhancing EFL learners' pragmatic and speech act abilities and is consistent with previous interlanguage research studies (Eslami-Rasekh et al, 2004;Kerber, 2020;Nguyen, Pham, & Pham, 2012). Furthermore, the teachability of pragmatic aspects of L2 through applying a 'pre-test/posttest' design is aligned with results from the following research (Alsuhaibani, 2020;Halenko & Jones, 2011;Khodareza & Lotfi, 2013;Rajabia et al 2015, Shark, 2019Yilmaz & Koc, 2020), in which learners were reported to have performed better in the post-test after the instruction phase. In addition, explicit instruction of requests to EFL learners was shown to be an effective tool in improving the students' pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic skills as was role play intervention (Fattah, 2018) and video-driven intervention in Alsmari's (2020) study of learner complaints.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…In regards to assessment of the methodology, the post-test data results provided further evidence for pedagogical intervention being an effective tool in enhancing EFL learners' pragmatic and speech act abilities and is consistent with previous interlanguage research studies (Eslami-Rasekh et al, 2004;Kerber, 2020;Nguyen, Pham, & Pham, 2012). Furthermore, the teachability of pragmatic aspects of L2 through applying a 'pre-test/posttest' design is aligned with results from the following research (Alsuhaibani, 2020;Halenko & Jones, 2011;Khodareza & Lotfi, 2013;Rajabia et al 2015, Shark, 2019Yilmaz & Koc, 2020), in which learners were reported to have performed better in the post-test after the instruction phase. In addition, explicit instruction of requests to EFL learners was shown to be an effective tool in improving the students' pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic skills as was role play intervention (Fattah, 2018) and video-driven intervention in Alsmari's (2020) study of learner complaints.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…In regards to assessment of the methodology, the post-test data results provided further evidence for pedagogical intervention being an effective tool in enhancing EFL learners' pragmatic and speech act abilities and is consistent with previous interlanguage research studies (Eslami-Rasekh et al, 2004;Kerber, 2020;Nguyen, Pham, & Pham, 2012). Furthermore, the teachability of pragmatic aspects of L2 through applying a 'pre-test/posttest' design is aligned with results from the following research (Alsuhaibani, 2020;Halenko & Jones, 2011;Khodareza & Lotfi, 2013;Rajabia et al 2015, Shark, 2019Yilmaz & Koc, 2020), in which learners were reported to have performed better in the post-test after the instruction phase. In addition, explicit instruction of requests to EFL learners was shown to be an effective tool in improving the students' pragmalinguistic and sociopragmatic skills as was role play intervention (Fattah, 2018) and video-driven intervention in Alsmari's (2020) study of learner complaints.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…For instance studies conducted by Kim and Taguchi (2016) and Taguchi and Kim (2014) showed that tasks could be set for students to perform PDR-high or PDR-low speech acts by optimizing interaction between learner and learner under teacher's guidance in order to learn both sociopragmatic and pragmalinguistic features (Kim & Taguchi, 2016;Taguchi & Kim, 2014). Some findings of the studies show that explicit or implicit teaching of pragmatic aspects may help learners to socialize or familiarize themselves to the aspects by the help of their teachers and their peers (Alsuhaibani, 2020;Lantz-Andersson, 2017;Sánchez-Hernández, 2018;Sydorenko, Daurio, & L. Thorne, 2017;Taguchi, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%