Developing engineering design expertise – part 1: framing

Steele, Clint

doi:10.1080/22054952.2015.1092649

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Currently, there is a plethora of different directions in the field of design expertise research e.g., industrial design (Huang and Li, 2015;Oygür and Ülkebas, 2021;Yilmaz and Daly, 2016;Jagtap, 2018;Rusten and Bryson, 2007), engineering design (Ahmed, 2007;Atman et. al., 2007;Steele, 2012), and architectural design (Alipour, 2021;Bernal, 2016;Gulari, 2015;Oluwatayo et. al., 2017), service design (Kuosa and Westerlund, 2012;Wetter-Edman and Malmberg, 2016), software design (Popovic and Kraal, 2010;Petre, 2009), interaction design (Begnum et.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design Expertise: A Structured Literature Review

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Today research has come far in explaining distinct aspects of design expertise at different skill levels. However, with the increasing number of studies, we argue there is a need to assimilate present knowledge. In this paper we advance the field of design expertise by conducting a structured literature review. Through a systematic search of papers, from 1970 to today, we identify 110 papers concerning design expertise. We then analyze the accumulated research, and map how design expertise research has evolved, in terms of what we know and what remains unexplored. Through the review, we contribute with a distinction of skills acquisition at increasing levels of design expertise.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design Expertise: A Structured Literature Review

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Reflection has been used to facilitate student learning in higher education [1][2][3][4], including engineering [5][6][7][8]. Rogers [2] examined many theories and definitions related to reflection and summarized that reflective thought is a "cognitive and affective process or activity that requires active engagement by the individual while examining one's responses, beliefs, and premises, resulting in integrating new understating gained into one's experience, learning, and/or enhanced personal and professional effectiveness."…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Variations in Reflections as a Method for Teaching and Assessment of Engineering Ethics

Bielefeldt

Polmear

Swan

et al.

2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Boulder in the Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural Engineering (CEAE) and Director for the Engineering Plus program. She has served as the Associate Chair for Undergraduate Education in the CEAE Department, as well as the ABET assessment coordinator. Professor Bielefeldt was also the faculty director of the Sustainable By Design Residential Academic Program, a living-learning community where students learned about and practice sustainability. Bielefeldt is also a licensed P.E. Professor Bielefeldt's research interests in engineering education include service-learning, sustainable engineering, social responsibility, ethics, and diversity.

show abstract

Developing engineering design expertise – part 1: framing

Cited by 2 publications

References 27 publications

Design Expertise: A Structured Literature Review

Design Expertise: A Structured Literature Review

Variations in Reflections as a Method for Teaching and Assessment of Engineering Ethics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About