Developing Engineering Identity in an Introductory Engineering Course: A Multi-Case Analysis

Abstract

Research in engineering education has identified several factors relevant to the development of students’ identity as engineers. Here we examine the engineering identity of undergraduate engineering students after an introductory engineering course. The specific research question explored here is: "How do engineering students in an introductory engineering course interpret competence, performance, and recognition in relation to their identities as engineers?” We used a modified engineering identity framework to explore the development of engineering identity within the undergraduate engineering context through a multiple case study approach. Six students majoring in engineering participated in the study. The students had divergent perspectives on what it meant to be competent as an engineer. In all cases, students connected both competence and performance as an engineer with persistence. At this introductory stage, self-recognition as an engineering person took center stage for each student. All were able to identify themselves strongly as an engineering person. The findings add to the current understandings about the development of engineering identity, and suggest that engineering identity may be critically important in conversations about the steps faculty may take in working with students to promote increased retention of undergraduate students in engineering.

Making the First Semester Your Own: Personal Experience and Lessons from a Chemical Engineering Freshman

“…Therefore, my advice from the mistake I initially made of not paying attention in some classes and depending too much on recordings at the beginning is this: stay self-vigilant that recording lectures also means you attend every live lecture with sincerity and become involved in the actual sessions given by lecturers, as those have incredibly more value to them. Also, it is worth telling that in the first semester, do not be demotivated or make the mistake of relating peak performance in tests and quizzes to your engineering identity growth like I initially did (Gray et al, 2021). There will be so plentiful time to improve yourself, your results and grades.…”