2006
DOI: 10.1080/10627197.2006.9652990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing Expertise With Classroom Assessment in K–12 Science: Learning to Interpret Student Work. Interim Findings From a 2-Year Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gearhart et al (2006) studied assessment-related teacher professional development that emphasized the 'relationship between understandings of assessment concepts and facility with assessment' (p. 259, emphasis added). Instead of literacy, they referred to this relationship as assessment expertise, which is consistent with the view that teaching expertise involves applying knowledge to the particular teaching context, not just acquiring the PCK needed to teach.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundations Of Assessment Expertisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gearhart et al (2006) studied assessment-related teacher professional development that emphasized the 'relationship between understandings of assessment concepts and facility with assessment' (p. 259, emphasis added). Instead of literacy, they referred to this relationship as assessment expertise, which is consistent with the view that teaching expertise involves applying knowledge to the particular teaching context, not just acquiring the PCK needed to teach.…”
Section: Theoretical Foundations Of Assessment Expertisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well established that the quality of formative assessment in the classroom is a key factor in student learning (Black & Wiliam, 1998;Brookhart, 2004;Kennedy, Brown, Draney, & Wilson, 2005;Shepard, 2001;Wilson & Sloane, 2000). Teachers need feasible assessment strategies that capture the range of student thinking in the classroom so they can build discussions and activities on student understanding, provide students with useful feedback, and make revisions in instructional plans (Black, Harrison, Lee, Marshall, & Wiliam, 2004;Cowie & Bell, 1999;Gearhart et al, 2006;Herman, Osmundson, Ayala, Schneider, & Timms, 2005;Russell, Qualter, & McGuigan, 1995). However, many of the assessments proposed by Smith et al capture student achievement only at milestones in the K through 8 progression, and therefore have limited capacity to capture student progress within a grade level, much less in the context of a specific lesson or lesson sequence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It should be noted that, although we have focused on state educational standards here, what is important is that there be a pedagogical goal driving the design and use of the simulation whether it is set by the state, educator, designer, or student-user, and that this goal be explicitly stated rather than remaining an implicit or ill-defined notion (Gearhart et al, 2006). Next, the designer or design team must consider the cognitive demands that the simulation will place on the student.…”
Section: The Assessment Design and Delivery System Templatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validity of inference must be considered when designing and using any assessment, including simulation-based assessment (Gearhart et al, 2006). For example, we are aware of a simulation that was designed to increase and test student understanding of dissolved gases in the blood.…”
Section: Important Characteristics Of Good Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation