2020
DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2020-7-77-100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing foreign language professional-communicative competence of pedagogical university students by means of CLIL

Abstract: Introduction. The article describes a study of an original CLILbased teaching model at a teacher-training university, designed specifically to develop students’ foreign language professional-communicative competence (FLPCC). Its relevance is due to a lack of research into applying CLIL theory and methodology in teacher-training institutions of higher education, as well as to a practical need to improve the quality of pedagogy undergraduates’ foreign language instruction.The aim of the present study is to subst… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, we analysed 151 references, 56 of which were excluded because they were papers found in both databases. The remaining 95 were evaluated for suitability based on their abstracts, and if there was any uncertainty, the complete text was examined Finally, this figure was reduced to 52 (Figure 1) due to the following exclusion criteria: the full text was not in English or Spanish (exclusion criterion b) [32][33][34][35][36]; CLIL or EMI was applied in disciplines other than mathematics (exclusion criterion c) [32,; the immersion or bilingual program was not CLIL, CBI and/or EMI (exclusion criterion d) [57,61,62]; research carried out in contexts where the use of CLIL, CBI or EMI for the teaching of mathematics is not English as L2 (exclusion criterion e) [13,17,[62][63][64][65]; research carried out in an instructional setting where the target population's L1 is English (exclusion criterion f) [56,[66][67][68][69]; and non-empirical studies (exclusion criterion g) [70,71].…”
Section: Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, we analysed 151 references, 56 of which were excluded because they were papers found in both databases. The remaining 95 were evaluated for suitability based on their abstracts, and if there was any uncertainty, the complete text was examined Finally, this figure was reduced to 52 (Figure 1) due to the following exclusion criteria: the full text was not in English or Spanish (exclusion criterion b) [32][33][34][35][36]; CLIL or EMI was applied in disciplines other than mathematics (exclusion criterion c) [32,; the immersion or bilingual program was not CLIL, CBI and/or EMI (exclusion criterion d) [57,61,62]; research carried out in contexts where the use of CLIL, CBI or EMI for the teaching of mathematics is not English as L2 (exclusion criterion e) [13,17,[62][63][64][65]; research carried out in an instructional setting where the target population's L1 is English (exclusion criterion f) [56,[66][67][68][69]; and non-empirical studies (exclusion criterion g) [70,71].…”
Section: Inclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Для этого она должна носить непрерывный, доверительный, разноформатный и побуждающий ученика к развитию внутренней образовательной мотивации характер, согласно D. Carless и D. Boud [5]. В исследовании О. Г. Бырдиной, Е. А. Юриновой, С. Г. Долженко, где студенты оценивали эффективность предметных курсов в развернутой анкете обратной связи, содержащей этот компонент, была убедительно показана выраженность самокритичной, конструктивной позиции у абсолютного большинства респондентов [25].…”
Section: обзор литературыunclassified
“…Yurinova, S.G. Dolzhenko presents the content and technological support of the process of foreign language formation competence through CLIL in the conditions of a pedagogical university. The experience of organizing tandem training of students by teachers from different scientific fields is presented [4]. The same researchers (O.G.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%