The 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2003. CEC '03.
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2003.1299904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing GA-based hybrid approaches for a real-world mixed-integer scheduling problem

Abstract: Abstract-Many real-worldscheduling problems are suited to a mixecbinteger formulation. The solution of these problems involves t h e determination of integer and continuous variables at each time interval of the scheduling period. The solution procedure requires simultaneous consideration of these two types of variables. In recent years researchers have focused much attention on developing new hybrid approaches using modern heuristic and traditional exact methods. This paper proposes the development of a varie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The composition of two tightly coupled combinatorial and continuous sub-problems of the GS problem represents a typical feature of scheduling problems posed in refinery and resource management [8,11,13,14,18]. Many real-world scheduling problems, such as resource allocation, inventory management, and process scheduling that occur in a broad range of industries are of a mixed-integer nature.…”
Section: Generation Scheduling Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The composition of two tightly coupled combinatorial and continuous sub-problems of the GS problem represents a typical feature of scheduling problems posed in refinery and resource management [8,11,13,14,18]. Many real-world scheduling problems, such as resource allocation, inventory management, and process scheduling that occur in a broad range of industries are of a mixed-integer nature.…”
Section: Generation Scheduling Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it can be seen from these figures that the GA solution gives the allocation of generation close to the optimum solution in the most of time periods, except the time periods between 13 and 22, and between 26 and 33. The balancing costs were not affected much by the GA solution in the time periods 26-33, but there is slight increase in the costs for periods [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In fact generator 3 significantly increased the price of electricity requiring drastic changes in the generation schedule, and the GA could not finely tune the dispatch variable in the given computational time.…”
Section: Test Results Comparison and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work by the authors presented GA -based approaches for the generation scheduling problems in centralized electricity industries have shown promising results [2,13,14]. However, the techniques used in the centralized system operation are not ideal for addressing the new market environments.…”
Section: Solution Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations