2006
DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-06-0340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing gene expression signatures of pathway deregulation in tumors

Abstract: Recent advances in our understanding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It also confirms that assessing entire signaling pathways, rather than individual genes, is highly informative with respect to cancer outcome prediction (Bild et al, 2006;Watters and Roberts, 2006;Liu and Ringner, 2007). For neuroblastoma in particular, combined analysis of multiple signaling networks has been successful and might benefit from the addition of other pathways, such as integrin signaling, to further increase prediction sensitivity (Fredlund et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…It also confirms that assessing entire signaling pathways, rather than individual genes, is highly informative with respect to cancer outcome prediction (Bild et al, 2006;Watters and Roberts, 2006;Liu and Ringner, 2007). For neuroblastoma in particular, combined analysis of multiple signaling networks has been successful and might benefit from the addition of other pathways, such as integrin signaling, to further increase prediction sensitivity (Fredlund et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Recently several studies investigating deregulation of signaling pathways, rather than the importance of expression of individual genes, as central to cancer aggressiveness have been published (40)(41)(42)(43). These observations are particularly interesting in light of the development of small inhibitory molecules able to inhibit individual pathways, and it has been shown that pathway analysis can be used to identify appropriate targets for therapeutic intervention (40).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 It is therefore plausible that RAS signaling deregulation is an important target of tipifarnib in AML regardless of RAS mutational status. 41 In support of this, Feldkamp et al demonstrated that isotype-specific RAS.GTP levels in brain tumors correlates with response to the FTI SCH66336 irrespective of RAS-activating mutations. 42 In addition, Bild et al recently showed that a gene-expression signature based on RAS overexpression could predict response to another FTI in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%