At present, there is no method available to predict response to farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTIs). We analyzed gene expression profiles from the bone marrow of patients from a phase 2 study of the FTI tipifarnib in older adults with previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The RASGRP1/APTX gene expression ratio was found to predict response to tipifarnib with the greatest accuracy using a "leave one out" cross validation (LOOCV; 96%). RASGRP1 is a guanine nucleotide exchange factor that activates RAS, while APTX (aprataxin) is involved in DNA excision repair. The utility of this classifier for predicting response to tipifarnib was validated in an independent set of 58 samples from relapsed or refractory AML, with a negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) of 92% and 28%, respectively (odds ratio of 4.4). The classifier also predicted for improved overall survival (154 vs 56 days; P < .001), which was independent of other covariates, including a previously described prognostic gene expression classifier. Therefore, these data indicate that a 2-gene expression assay may have utility in categorizing a population of patients with AML who are more likely to respond to tipifarnib.
IntroductionTipifarnib (R115777; ZARNESTRA, Janssen Ortho, Gurabo, Puerto Rico) was one of the first farnesyltransferase inhibitors (FTIs) to be tested in the clinic. 1 It has demonstrated significant activity in hematologic disorders, including acute myeloid leukemia (AML), multiple myeloma (MM), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), with complete response rates in AML and MDS of up to approximately 15%. [2][3][4][5][6] FTIs function by competitively inhibiting the addition of a farnesyl moiety to a number of important signaling molecules, including RAS. 1,7 Historically, the mutation status of the RAS gene was considered to be a candidate biomarker for patient response to FTIs. This rationale was based on the finding that specific point mutations within RAS genes cause constitutive activation of the RAS pathway in many cancers, 8 and on preclinical evidence that FTIs could block RAS-transformed cells. 9,10 Since it is generally accepted that tumors are heavily reliant on the activation of 1 or 2 pathways ("oncogene addiction" hypothesis), it follows that patients whose tumors are promoted by aberrant expression of one or more components of those pathways should respond to drugs that inhibit those components. 11 However, pathways can be activated by multiple events, and it has been found that RAS can be up-regulated in the absence of activating RAS mutations. 12 Furthermore, no correlation between RAS mutations and response to FTIs has been demonstrated in clinical studies. 2,13 Indeed, while several early clinical studies focused on cancers that exhibited high frequencies of RAS mutations, the response rates to FTIs were disappointingly low in those trials. 3,14,15 Microarray technology has been used to identify gene expression profiles that are predictive of respo...