2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.11.062
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing hierarchically ultra-micro/mesoporous biocarbons for highly selective carbon dioxide adsorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the results obtained, the authors highlighted the Vultra value obtained for the R7_2T_10PEI carbon sample, which had the highest ultra-microporosity (0.175 cm 3 /g) with a mono-modal pore size distribution centred at 0.37 nm (a value a bit higher than the dynamic diameter of CO2 molecules, 0.34 nm). Nevertheless, in spite of possessing similar values of Vultra than the reported by Liu et al [27] and Xu et al [11], the two samples studied here do not present CO2 uptakes so high as the values reported by these two authors in their works. This could be explained, as it was mentioned above, because of the high percentage of mesoporous presented by these materials.…”
Section: 1porous Properties and Co2 Adsorption Capacity At 0°csupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…From the results obtained, the authors highlighted the Vultra value obtained for the R7_2T_10PEI carbon sample, which had the highest ultra-microporosity (0.175 cm 3 /g) with a mono-modal pore size distribution centred at 0.37 nm (a value a bit higher than the dynamic diameter of CO2 molecules, 0.34 nm). Nevertheless, in spite of possessing similar values of Vultra than the reported by Liu et al [27] and Xu et al [11], the two samples studied here do not present CO2 uptakes so high as the values reported by these two authors in their works. This could be explained, as it was mentioned above, because of the high percentage of mesoporous presented by these materials.…”
Section: 1porous Properties and Co2 Adsorption Capacity At 0°csupporting
confidence: 64%
“…As it can be seen, this value is especially high for the AC_HTC_KOH_5_700 (0,192 cm 3 g -1 ) and AC_HTC _ZN_700_CO2_1 (0,198 cm 3 g -1 ) samples. Some previous works [2,4,5,8,27] reported high values of ultra-micropore volume (also estimated using DFT or NLDFT methods) for the ACs studied (up to 0.148 cm 3 g -1 ) but it was not until recently that Xu et al [11] and Liu et al [27] found values so elevated as the showed by these two hydrochars investigated in this work. Xu et al [11] obtained, using a DFT-based model, values of Vultra between 0.171 and 0.209 cm 3 g -1 for camphor leaves chemically activated with KOH at different temperatures.…”
Section: 1porous Properties and Co2 Adsorption Capacity At 0°cmentioning
confidence: 47%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The method of post-combustion CO 2 capture includes absorption by aqueous solutions, adsorption by solid materials and membrane separation. Among them, the adsorption method is advantageous due to the low energy consumption and easy regeneration of the adsorbent, without producing adverse by-products or contaminated sorbents [4][5][6][7]. Activated carbon, zeolites and metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are carbon dioxide capture adsorbents described in the literature [8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among many adsorbents currently under development, amine functionalized solid adsorbents [11] are well recognised as being a class of adsorbents outperforming virtually any other solid adsorbents (e.g. zeolite [12], MOFs [13] and carbon based adsorbents [14][15][16] in many important aspects, such as their favourable operating temperature windows of 50-80°C, high CO2 adsorption capacity and selectivity and fast adsorption rate at low CO2 partial pressures (<15% v/v), which are the key requisites of capture materials recommended by the CCIC report. It has been reported that a solid adsorbent looping CO2 capture process, which can be easily facilitated either with circulating fluidised bed or dual fluidised bed technologies, is able to provide breakthrough energy cost reductions of 30-50% or more compared to advanced solvent systems [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%