2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13253-018-00340-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing Integer Calibration Weights for Census of Agriculture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The probability of correct classification of a farm by the Census, π CFCC , is estimated from a separate logistic regression model (see [5] for details). The published Census numbers are obtained after the model-based adjusted estimates are calibrated to ensure consistency of estimates [25]. Standard errors of the adjusted Census estimates are calculated using a combination of jackknife and bootstrap methodologies.…”
Section: Estimation From the Census Of Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of correct classification of a farm by the Census, π CFCC , is estimated from a separate logistic regression model (see [5] for details). The published Census numbers are obtained after the model-based adjusted estimates are calibrated to ensure consistency of estimates [25]. Standard errors of the adjusted Census estimates are calculated using a combination of jackknife and bootstrap methodologies.…”
Section: Estimation From the Census Of Agriculturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some outliers were identified when generating the direct survey estimates, other outliers were found during modeling. The schedule had to include the time to investigate each of the outliers to ensure that they properly represented the reported data (had no errors) and to then use the integer calibration algorithm [34] to distribute the outliers' weights within the state. For the reviews within the state field offices and by the Agricultural Statistics Board, tools are available to facilitate the review process, but were not designed for the inclusion of modeled estimates or their measures of uncertainty.…”
Section: Moving the Models Into Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mail survey response rates have declined by roughly 0.76% per year over nearly five decades (Stedman et al, 2019), despite efforts to reverse such trends (Avemegah et al, 2021; Glas et al, 2019). This extends to surveys from the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) and its agency, the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS), which is responsible for the Census of Agriculture, the basis of numerous social and farm programs, funding formulas, as well as planning and operational activities (Sartore et al, 2019). Response rates for NASS crop acreage and production surveys have declined from 80% to 85% in the early 1990s to less than 60% in some cases and declining at an accelerating rate in the last few years (Johansson et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%