2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.03.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing models of how cognitive improvements change functioning: Mediation, moderation and moderated mediation

Abstract: BackgroundCognitive remediation (CRT) affects functioning but the extent and type of cognitive improvements necessary are unknown.AimTo develop and test models of how cognitive improvement transfers to work behaviour using the data from a current service.MethodParticipants (N49) with a support worker and a paid or voluntary job were offered CRT in a Phase 2 single group design with three assessments: baseline, post therapy and follow-up. Working memory, cognitive flexibility, planning and work outcomes were as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
39
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
6
39
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses were conducted using all available data excluding those from participants who did not meet entry criteria. Thus, an intent-to-treat (ITT) approach was adopted, assuming data were missing at random (MAR), including any significant predictors of drop-out as covariates, consistent with previous research (Wykes et al 2012). One-way ANOVAs were conducted to determine: (1) whether those who withdrew from the study were different from those who completed the study; and (2) whether any baseline variable differed between treatment conditions despite randomization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analyses were conducted using all available data excluding those from participants who did not meet entry criteria. Thus, an intent-to-treat (ITT) approach was adopted, assuming data were missing at random (MAR), including any significant predictors of drop-out as covariates, consistent with previous research (Wykes et al 2012). One-way ANOVAs were conducted to determine: (1) whether those who withdrew from the study were different from those who completed the study; and (2) whether any baseline variable differed between treatment conditions despite randomization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metacognition as defined by Flavell (1979) contributes to the use of cognitive processes in everyday life (Wykes et al, 2012). Support comes from the finding that metacognition is an important factor in cognitive treatment, for example, in people with traumatic brain injury or stroke (Cicerone et al, 2011).…”
Section: Metacognition and Functional Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metacognition is needed to reflect on cognitive processes and contributes to the way cognitive processes are used in everyday life, which directly affects social functioning (Cella et al, 2014;Green et al, 2000;Wykes et al, 2012). Metacognition has already been found to mediate the relationship between cognitive improvement following cognitive remediation and functional outcome (Wykes & Spaulding, 2011;Wykes et al, 2012).…”
Section: Metacognition and Functional Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ultimate goal of addressing CIAS is to improve real-world functioning. The relationship between cognition and function in schizophrenia is robust but the way cognitive improvements change functioning is still an open question (Wykes et al, 2012). Nevertheless, meta-analytic evidence suggests that stronger effects on function are produced when cognitive remediation is added to other rehabilitation programs .…”
Section: When and How To Combine Cognitive Remediation With Cognitivementioning
confidence: 99%