“…Nevertheless, it should be recognised that changes even occur in the recognition of action research theory, although action research has evolved since the beginning of the 20 th century and even the end of the 19 th century. At DU, the analysis of this issue has been one of the issues related to the use and development of action research theory (SalÓte, 1993(SalÓte, , 1998(SalÓte, , 2000(SalÓte, , 2009(SalÓte, , 2015Pipere & SalÓte, 2006;SalÓte, MiËule et al 2007;Gri‚ne, 2007;Belousa, OÔehnoviËa et al, 2007;SalÓte, Ged˛˚ne, & Ged˛˚ne, 2009;SalÓte, Ignatjeva, & Salitis, 2009;SalÓte, Ged˛˚ne, & Ged˛˚ne, 2010;Switala, 2010Switala, , 2011Switala, , 2012Ged˛˚ne, G. et al, 2011;Kapenieks & SalÓte, 2012;Badjanova, Iliko, & Drelinga, 2013;Kravale, Iliko, & OÔehnoviËa, 2013;Pipere, Veisson, & SalÓte, 2015;Ged˛˚ne, G., 2015;Ged˛˚ne, I., 2015;Briede, 2015;Switala, 2015;ZariÚa, Drelinga, Iliko, & KrastiÚa, 2016), with the focus on the recognition of action research complex nonlinear nature and attempts to get rid of the complicated approach, which often dominates in the current action research within scientific research.…”