2020
DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2020.1756515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing socioscientific perspective taking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, extant research demonstrates SSI interventions have had inconsistent impacts on how students' reason about SSI, with some indicating formal and traditional environments are limited in their ability to promote advanced socioscientific reasoning (Bencze, 2017; Karahan & Roehrig, 2017; Sperling & Bencze, 2010). However, there are indications that having rich pedagogical support both within more progressive school settings (Leden et al, 2017; Newton & Zeidler, 2020) and informal place‐based contexts (Herman, 2018; Kim et al, 2020; Kinslow et al, 2019) can lead to increased conceptual understanding of scientific content, the NOS, emotive concerns and other SSI dimensions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, extant research demonstrates SSI interventions have had inconsistent impacts on how students' reason about SSI, with some indicating formal and traditional environments are limited in their ability to promote advanced socioscientific reasoning (Bencze, 2017; Karahan & Roehrig, 2017; Sperling & Bencze, 2010). However, there are indications that having rich pedagogical support both within more progressive school settings (Leden et al, 2017; Newton & Zeidler, 2020) and informal place‐based contexts (Herman, 2018; Kim et al, 2020; Kinslow et al, 2019) can lead to increased conceptual understanding of scientific content, the NOS, emotive concerns and other SSI dimensions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Discussions of SSI allow students to consider the moral and ethical aspects of science and their consequences for society (Zeidler, Sadler, Applebaum, & Callahan, 2009), and to make decisions that incorporate moral judgements. Second, SSI-based instruction facilitates the development of student skills, such as critical thinking (Wang, Chen, Lin, Huang, & Hong, 2017), decision-making (Fang, Hsu, & Lin, 2019), argumentation (Dawson & Carson, 2020), informal reasoning (Karpudewan & Roth, 2018), and perspective taking (Newton & Zeidler, 2020), which are crucial for making informed judgements and participating in discussions about SSI. Third, understanding the NOS has been recognised by many to inform judgements about SSI (Leung, 2020a;Leung, Wong, & Yung, 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Ideal Of the Ssi Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When designing student worksheets based on SSI, it is essential to choose a problem that is relevant and appealing to students. It allows students to negotiate the complex sociocultural aspects of the given issue, which is, in turn, provide experiences that foster the necessary skills to participate in the resolution of the issue [26] [27] [28]. Integrating SSI into chemistry concepts can be varied.…”
Section: The Influence Of Ssi-based Student Workheets On Conceptual Understandingmentioning
confidence: 99%