2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0941-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing specific reporting guidelines for diagnostic accuracy studies assessing AI interventions: The STARD-AI Steering Group

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
131
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
131
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This extension is particularly aimed at investigators and readers reporting or appraising clinical trials; however, it may also serve as useful guidance for developers of AI interventions in earlier validation stages of an AI system. Investigators seeking to report studies developing and validating the diagnostic and predictive properties of AI models should refer to TRIPOD-ML (Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis - Machine Learning) and STARD-AI (Standards for Reporting Diagnostic accuracy studies - Artificial Intelligence), both of which are currently under development 3262. Other potentially relevant guidelines are registered with the EQUATOR network, which are agnostic to study design 63.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This extension is particularly aimed at investigators and readers reporting or appraising clinical trials; however, it may also serve as useful guidance for developers of AI interventions in earlier validation stages of an AI system. Investigators seeking to report studies developing and validating the diagnostic and predictive properties of AI models should refer to TRIPOD-ML (Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis - Machine Learning) and STARD-AI (Standards for Reporting Diagnostic accuracy studies - Artificial Intelligence), both of which are currently under development 3262. Other potentially relevant guidelines are registered with the EQUATOR network, which are agnostic to study design 63.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This extension is particularly aimed at investigators planning or conducting clinical trials; however, it may also serve as useful guidance for developers of AI interventions in earlier validation stages of an AI system. Investigators seeking to report studies developing and validating the diagnostic and predictive properties of AI models should refer to TRIPOD-ML (Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis - Machine Learning)24 and STARD-AI (Standards for Reporting Diagnostic accuracy studies - Artificial Intelligence),51 both of which are currently under development. Other potentially relevant guidelines are registered with the EQUATOR network which are agnostic to study design 52.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 National Institute of Health Research BRC for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. 7 Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future work is already underway to improve the standard of design and reporting for non-randomized studies including retrospective observational analysis and the development of prognostic models that depend upon AI. This work will soon lead to EQUATOR-supported guidelines specifically for both diagnostic test accuracy studies (STARD-AI [7]) and prognostic model evaluations (TRIPOD-ML [8]).…”
Section: Flattening the Hype Curve In Aimentioning
confidence: 99%