2013
DOI: 10.1080/14783363.2013.839166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing strategies for improving the service quality of casual-dining restaurants: New insights from integrating IPGA and QFD analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tsai and Lin (2014) developed a two-phase service quality strategy model to identify defective service attributes and uncovered their root causes for the hotel sector by integrating the importanceperformance gap analysis model, service triangle and gap analysis. Cheng, Tsai and Lin (2015) integrated IPGA with the QFD model in order to determine the critical service quality attributes and to develop their improvement programs and improvement priority for casual-dining restaurants. The research studies mentioned above have contributed much to the improvement of service quality, but most of their results only put forward key factors to improve service quality or construct improvement strategies while failing to present a specific management test mechanism at the execution level of service quality improvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Tsai and Lin (2014) developed a two-phase service quality strategy model to identify defective service attributes and uncovered their root causes for the hotel sector by integrating the importanceperformance gap analysis model, service triangle and gap analysis. Cheng, Tsai and Lin (2015) integrated IPGA with the QFD model in order to determine the critical service quality attributes and to develop their improvement programs and improvement priority for casual-dining restaurants. The research studies mentioned above have contributed much to the improvement of service quality, but most of their results only put forward key factors to improve service quality or construct improvement strategies while failing to present a specific management test mechanism at the execution level of service quality improvement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the HoQ design, the left side of the house includes customer requirements, whereas the roof of the house is the technical design of products or services to customers, of which the priority level of customers is the evaluation principle for the technical designs of products or services (Ikiz and Masoudi, 2008;Wang, 2007). Many scholars have used this method to discuss decision-making issues for the improvement of service quality (Cheng, Tsai and Lin, 2015;Cheng, Tsai and Lin, 2016), and according to Ramanathan and Yunfeng (2009), the HoQ design is as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Quality Function Deploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Later, several modifications of the generic SERVQUAL instrument were developed to better suit the specifics of the hospitality industry, such as DINESERV for restaurants (Stevens, Knutson, and Patton 1995), TANGSERV for measuring tangible quality (Raajpoot 2002), LODGSERV for measuring quality in the lodging sector (Knutson et al 1990), etc. Scholars have also proposed alternative models for restaurant quality measurement, such as a marketing-oriented (7P) quality model (Kukanja, Gomezelj Omerzel, and Kodrič 2017) and a quality model combining the importance-performance analysis (IPA) and the quality function deployment (QFD) method (Cheng, Tsai, and Lin 2015). According to Liu and Tse (2018), although alternative models have been proposed, DINESERV remains the most popular and frequently used diagnostic tool for service quality evaluation in the restaurant industry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%