2014
DOI: 10.1080/0305764x.2014.914155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing student voice and participatory pedagogy: a case study in a Spanish primary school

Abstract: This article describes a case study that is part of a broader research project in which schools set up processes of school improvement inspired by the proposals put forward by students. The project furthers the initiatives of the student voice movement and seeks to implement more participative pedagogical models. This as a whole represents a novel opportunity in the context of Spanish schools. Specifically, in the text we describe an experience in which students work as researchers (SAR) and in which we descri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This article is part of a broader research project 1 financed by the Ministry of Science and Innovation, which was carried out in 13 schools in the region of Cantabria (Spain) over a four year period (2011-2015). The theoretical arguments underlying this research have been extensively described in previous papers (Susinos Rada & Haya Salmón, 2014;Susinos Rada, Haya Salmón & Ceballos López, 2015) and are supported by the student voice movement, SV. Under the leadership of authors committed to a democratic and participative school model (Bragg, 2007;Fielding, 2011;Rudduck & Flutter, 2007), this movement has grown considerably in recent years, especially in Anglo-Saxon countries, although it is hardly known in Spain.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…This article is part of a broader research project 1 financed by the Ministry of Science and Innovation, which was carried out in 13 schools in the region of Cantabria (Spain) over a four year period (2011-2015). The theoretical arguments underlying this research have been extensively described in previous papers (Susinos Rada & Haya Salmón, 2014;Susinos Rada, Haya Salmón & Ceballos López, 2015) and are supported by the student voice movement, SV. Under the leadership of authors committed to a democratic and participative school model (Bragg, 2007;Fielding, 2011;Rudduck & Flutter, 2007), this movement has grown considerably in recent years, especially in Anglo-Saxon countries, although it is hardly known in Spain.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Por ello, es importante considerar y tener en cuenta al alumnado en el proceso educativo tanto en el ámbito universitario (Cassidy, 2004) como en la escuela (Ceballos, Susinos y Saiz, 2016;Ceballos-López y Saiz-Linares, 2019;Susinos y Haya, 2014), pues según enfoque esta situación, va a tener uno u otro impacto sobre su rendimiento y aprovechamiento académico, de tal manera que este puede revertir en la satisfacción de las Necesidades Psicológicas Básicas (NPB), esto es autonomía, relación y competencia para mejorar la motivación intrínseca y, consecuentemente, el rendimiento académico (Doménech y Gómez, 2011;Reggiani, 2013); además, el alumnado alcanzará un bienestar psicológico que favorecerá un aprendizaje más efectivo (Deci y Ryan, 2008) así como situaciones afectivas positivas (Sevil-Serrano, Abarca-Sos, Julián-Clemente, Murillo-Pardo y García-González,…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…These elements are not new in the field of education; for decades, studies have pointed out the importance of listening to pupils’ perspectives in developing education (Cook-Sather, 2002; Dahl, 1995; Nieto, 1994; Raymond, 2001; Whitehead & Clough, 2004) or described the social nature of teaching and learning (Brophy, 2002; Kumpulainen & Renshaw, 2007; Wells, 2002). There have also been a number of studies related to pupils’ participation in the school context that discuss how their participation can be enabled in school contexts (Kirby & Woodhead, 2003; Maitles & Deuchar, 2006; Niemi, Kumpulainen, & Lipponen, 2015a, 2015b; Niemi, Kumpulainen, Lipponen, & Hilppö, 2015; Susinos & Haya, 2014; Whitehead & Clough, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%