2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2008.06.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing suitability maps for rainwater harvesting in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
107
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
107
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the results are very similar, Method 2 gives a slightly higher score for the jessour in Sub-catchment 2 (jessour 10-16) and Sub-catchment 3 (jessour [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Comparison Of Methods 1 Andmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although the results are very similar, Method 2 gives a slightly higher score for the jessour in Sub-catchment 2 (jessour 10-16) and Sub-catchment 3 (jessour [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Comparison Of Methods 1 Andmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In most previous studies, the number of criteria are limited and are aimed primarily at the selection of suitable locations for RWH [1,14] and do not consider other factors or performance over time. In addition, many of those studies were mainly desktop studies using GIS and RS, without including stakeholders' objectives and constrains.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In India, potential sites for water harvesting were identified applying the International Mission for Sustainability Developments guidelines within a GIS environment (Kumar et al, 2008;Singh et al, 2009). In South Africa, there are several studies where GIS based decision support systems were developed to locate suitable sites for water harvesting (De Winnaar et al, 2007;Kahinda et al, 2008;Kahinda et al, 2009;Mbilinyi et al, 2005). There are similar examples in other countries where GIS was used to consider stormwater harvesting potential in rural areas (Bakir and Xingnan, 2008;El-Awar et al, 2000;Hamdan et al, 2007;Kirzhner and Kadmon, 2011;Viavattene et al, 2008;Ziadat et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%