Developing sustainable societies – a dialogical network perspective

Abstract

Purpose-The purpose of this paper is to describe and discuss how and to what extent creative dialogue processes can have an impact on regional political planning processes in Norway. Politicians at Nordland County invited representatives from six different regions in Nordland to participate in café dialogues. Design/methodology/approach-The empirical material is collected from café-dialogues in Northern Norway in which representatives from civil society, business organizations, local government, and NGOs participated. The data processing is based on triangulation of hermeneutic interpretation, frequencies, and factor analysis. Findings-The findings indicate that most people want a "greener" future; this can be described as sustainable societies based on ecological production, distribution, consumption, and redistribution. People take on a more radical position in their ideas about the future than most politicians. The factor analysis grouped the participants into the following categories; "Ecological economics", "Small is beautiful", "Entrepreneurs", and "Growth and control". A large number of the participants are categorized either as "Circulation economics" or "Small is beautiful". Practical implications-To solve the challenges of modern society politicians can instigate more radical solutions than they are in the habit of doing. The participants in the café dialogues describe fundamental changes in order to attain viable local societies per 2030. Originality/value-In this paper the authors demonstrate that cultural creatives in the USA give a relevant context for interpreting attitudes to change in small societies in Northern Norway.

Exploring the Local Sustainability Approach Using Indicators

“…The interaction among three pillars that are economic, ecological and social systems should be based on a holistic worldview. In this perspective, the concept of sustainability and wellbeing depend on interplay between the three pillars (Ingulfsvann, Jakobsen, & Nystad, 2015).…”