2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing systematic search methods for the library literature: Methods and analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within library and information science, similar frameworks have been developed. Drawing on the work by Stansfield (2018), Stapleton et al (2020) recommend the following steps in the development of the search strategy: (1) isolate main concepts of research question, (2) search term development and (3) search strategy construction. For this review, we consider the following main concepts: cancer patients, information seeking and coping.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within library and information science, similar frameworks have been developed. Drawing on the work by Stansfield (2018), Stapleton et al (2020) recommend the following steps in the development of the search strategy: (1) isolate main concepts of research question, (2) search term development and (3) search strategy construction. For this review, we consider the following main concepts: cancer patients, information seeking and coping.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A full list of search terms are available as supplementary material. We combine all the search terms into one search strategy using the approach recommended by Stapleton et al (2020). The literature is retrieved using four databases: Medline, CINAHL, Scopus and Embase.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other sources of potential agricultural grey literature include grower group websites, state government department website and repositories, and university libraries. Searches of grey literature are noted as being more time consuming than database searches for white literature (Stapleton et al 2020) and there are currently no recognised methods for searching these sources within the agricultural sector. Further, references located via OFT can be cited in journal publications according to the Terms of Use (https://www.farmtrials.com.au/terms-of-use/).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The development of more specific guidelines for academics and researchers on how to include grey literature searches in reviews will be important as the practice of systematic review in the field continues to mature (Garousi et al 2019). Research investigating the effectiveness of search methods for health-related grey literature have been well reported, and social sciences have also been recently considered (Stapleton et al 2020), but methods for conducting systematic searching of grey literature within agricultural research have not been reported. Indeed, the framework proposed for conducting systematic literature reviews in agricultural sciences by Koutsos et al (2019) did not include grey literature searches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bibliometric data analysis was extracted from Scopus by using search string "agroforest*" while symbol * improved sensitivity on variation of keywords [13]; e.g., agroforestry, agroforest, agroforester; and booleans ("OR" "AND") were not used as search string in the bibliometric data. Scopus provides checklist of instant searching steps [14]. Researching on Scopus used a determined location Indonesia, and type of publication were journals, proceedings, books, and found a number of 655 publications.…”
Section: Bibliometric Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%