2020
DOI: 10.1080/21532974.2020.1724840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge survey items: A review of literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In exploring and developing teachers' knowledge for technology integration in instruction, numerous studies have adopted the framework which has proved to be useful in explaining the kind of knowledge teachers may need for effective technology integration (Mishra, 2019;Njiku et al, 2020a). However, the conceptualisation of the framework and definitions of its constructs is still a continuing discussion among researchers (Alemdag et al, 2019;Ocak & Baran, 2019).…”
Section: The Tpack Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In exploring and developing teachers' knowledge for technology integration in instruction, numerous studies have adopted the framework which has proved to be useful in explaining the kind of knowledge teachers may need for effective technology integration (Mishra, 2019;Njiku et al, 2020a). However, the conceptualisation of the framework and definitions of its constructs is still a continuing discussion among researchers (Alemdag et al, 2019;Ocak & Baran, 2019).…”
Section: The Tpack Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items were organised in such a way that the TPACK primary domains of technology, content, and pedagogy informed their interactions. This means the questionnaire ensured that some items from the primary domains were used to form items for TCK, PCK, TPK, and TPACK (Njiku et al, 2020a). The questionnaire was initially made of 82 items.…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Bao [22] suggests that Chinese students are not so thorough in online learning, which may limit online learning modules' efficacy; they suggested that teachers pay extra attention to their online lectures' volume and speed. The main reason for such a strong relationship between teachers' learner knowledge and pedagogical knowledge can be attributed to learner knowledge being identified by Koehler and Mishra [22] as a part of pedagogical knowledge [84], which possibly led to its low-value Bayes factor as presented in this study. In addition, teachers' technological knowledge and academic content knowledge had a strong relationship in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…More current literature reviews have typically focused on specific issues such as faculty professional development (Moreno, Montoro, & Colon, 2019), faculty professional development within the STEM context (Chai, 2019) or the importance of faculty TPACK in creating effective learning environments within the reading context (Sarjoni, Rahman, Sabil, & Khambari, 2020). Njiku, Mutarutinya, and Maniraho's (2020) study evaluated TPACK survey instruments from 28 peer-reviewed articles. Their study was limited by the databases they used (Google Scholar, ERIC, and Scopus) and singular search phrase, "TPACK survey instrument validation" (Njiku et al, 2020, p. 5).…”
Section: Tpack Literature Review Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%