Developing the China Standards of English: challenges at macropolitical and micropolitical levels

Abstract

Background: A project has recently been proposed by the National Education Examinations Authority, P. R. China, to develop a national framework of reference for English language education, provisionally called China Standards of English (CSE). In this article, we argue for the necessity of developing the framework of reference in China and challenges facing such an important endeavor. Methods: We first reviewed relevant documents of English language education in China to identify the overlaps and inconsistencies in the curricular requirements at different educational stages. We then explored the need for improving the transparency in policies and practices of English language education. Finally, challenges facing the development and implementation of the CSE were discussed based on Alderson's (2009) conceptualization of politics in language education. Results: For governmental organizations, coordinating resources and negotiating views of different educational stages may prove challenging due to the segmental management structure of English language education in China. Micropolitically, the CSE project may face technical challenges due to the innovative nature of the work involved. Resistance may also be encountered from practitioners who may pay lip service to the new framework and feel reluctant to change their pedagogical and assessment practices. Conclusions: The discussion of challenges facing the development of a national framework for English, the first of its kind in China, is intended to influence and inform decisions on how the CSE can be developed, and more importantly, how the framework can be implemented so as to achieve the ultimate purpose of improving English teaching, learning and assessment in China.

Modelling the Relationship Between Chinese University Students’ Authentic Language Learning and Their English Self-efficacy During the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…It consists of four dimensions with 20 items measuring university students’ self-efficacy for English listening, speaking, reading, and writing based on the framework of the Questionnaire of English Self-Efficacy (QESE) (Cronbach’s α ranging from 0.88 to 0.92) (Wang et al, 2014 ). To better target Chinese university students’ self-efficacy, some items were modified with more specific descriptors of university-level English skills (Level 4–5) from China Standards of English Language Ability (Jin et al, 2017 ). For example, when measuring listening self-efficacy, the original item “Can you understand American TV programs”?…”

Issues on the initial impact of CEFR in Thailand and the region

“…In China, the development of a national framework of reference was one of the responses to this need for a more transparent education system (Jin, Wu, Alderson, & Song, 2017 language education as has happened in several other countries in the region.…”

“…Apart from the internal needs and interests of the Chinese government to improve English language education, there is an ever-increasing external influence to respond to the challenge of globalization by making the education system more transparent to the outside world. The development of a national framework of reference is one of the responses to this need for a more transparent education system (Jin et al, 2017). China's Standards of English Language Ability (CSE) (2018) has been developed by the NEEA as the national framework of reference for English language education.…”

Measuring L2 Essay Rating Strategy: Scale Development and Preliminary Validation

“…At present, CET4 and its sister (CET6) are the largest and most influential English tests in China. CET4 has two administrations each year, and each administration has nine million test-takers (Jin, 2017). The huge test population brings heavy workload to raters, hence ".…”