2020
DOI: 10.1029/2020ms002319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing the Coupled CWRF‐FVCOM Modeling System to Understand and Predict Atmosphere‐Watershed Interactions Over the Great Lakes Region

Abstract: Coupling 3-D hydrodynamics with climate models is necessary but difficult for resolving multiscale interactions and has been rarely implemented in predicting Great Lakes' water level fluctuations because of issues in treating net basin supply (NBS) components and connecting channel flows. This study developed an interactive lake-atmosphere-hydrology modeling system by coupling the regional Climate-Weather Research and Forecasting model (CWRF) with the 3-D unstructured-grid Finite Volume Coastal Ocean Model (FV… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 168 publications
(192 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment—North American project, some RCMs (e.g., Canadian regional climate model, Scinocca et al., 2016) couple with a one‐dimensional lake model called the Fresh Water Lake model (Mironov et al., 2004), which can provide improved results compared to the interpolation approach (Gula & Peltier, 2012; Xiao et al., 2018). Other researchers have developed more complex coupled modeling systems using three‐dimensional hydrodynamic lake models that were shown to be even more accurate than the RCMs with one‐dimensional lake models (Sun et al., 2020; Xue et al., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment—North American project, some RCMs (e.g., Canadian regional climate model, Scinocca et al., 2016) couple with a one‐dimensional lake model called the Fresh Water Lake model (Mironov et al., 2004), which can provide improved results compared to the interpolation approach (Gula & Peltier, 2012; Xiao et al., 2018). Other researchers have developed more complex coupled modeling systems using three‐dimensional hydrodynamic lake models that were shown to be even more accurate than the RCMs with one‐dimensional lake models (Sun et al., 2020; Xue et al., 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The University of Maryland makes significant contributions through six publications focused on precipitation and climate models. Although they do not mention the nexus approach, their findings are pivotal to assessing models that incorporate the effects of climate change in accounting for changing patterns of precipitation for agriculture and hydroelectric energy (Sun and Liang, 2020a , b ; Sun et al, 2020 ; Li et al, 2021 ). It is important to highlight that almost all publications from this are co-authored by researchers from their partner, Nanjing Agricultural University, which may result from a project governance policy developed by the U Maryland and Nanjing U team.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussion Of Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widespread of the Great Lakes region has unavoidable influences on the atmospheric dynamics (Sun et al., 2020). Conversely, the Great Lakes hydrodynamics are majorly governed by the meteorological parameters and the rapid intervention of climate change.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies for the Great Lakes cover broad aspects of lake meteorology, circulation, biogeochemical cycle in a changing climate; however, a thorough analysis of lake dynamics for a long‐term climate projection is merely attempted. Meanwhile, investigations on the dynamics of lake circulation have been challenging for a long timescale and large spatial extent (Abraham et al., 2013; Sun et al., 2020). Key challenges to this issue can be (a) the uncertainty involved in hydrodynamic simulations due to the lack of high‐resolution atmospheric products, (b) the degree of complexity associated with climate change and lake geography, (c) insufficient knowledge of the lake’s three‐dimensional thermal profile, and (d) the diversity in episodic and regional (sector‐wide) lake hydrodynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%