Developing the Critical Thinking Skills of Astrobiology Students through Creative and Scientific Inquiry

Abstract

Scientific inquiry represents a multifaceted approach to explore and understand the natural world. Training students in the principles of scientific inquiry can help promote the scientific learning process as well as help students enhance their understanding of scientific research. Here, we report on the development and implementation of a learning module that introduces astrobiology students to the concepts of creative and scientific inquiry, as well as provide practical exercises to build critical thinking skills. The module contained three distinct components: (1) a creative inquiry activity designed to introduce concepts regarding the role of creativity in scientific inquiry; (2) guidelines to help astrobiology students formulate and self-assess questions regarding various scientific content and imagery; and (3) a practical exercise where students were allowed to watch a scientific presentation and practice their analytical skills. Pre-and post-course surveys were used to assess the students' perceptions regarding creative and scientific inquiry and whether this activity impacted their understanding of the scientific process. Survey results indicate that the exercise helped improve students' science skills by promoting awareness regarding the role of creativity in scientific inquiry and building their confidence in formulating and assessing scientific questions. Together, the module and survey results confirm the need to include such inquiry-based activities into the higher education classroom, thereby helping students hone their critical thinking and question asking skill set and facilitating their professional development in astrobiology.

Where is the “g” in creativity? A specialization–differentiation hypothesis

“…Based on this view, there is an established set of resources that seems to be involved in creative performance across domains and tasks (e.g., divergent thinking, openness to experiences, intrinsic motivation)—perhaps representing the domain-general aspects of creativity. To achieve a high level of creativity, an “optimal” combination of these resources is necessary, and such a combination could vary according to the domain or task under consideration (e.g., Barbot et al, 2011 ; Lubart et al, 2013 ). As an example, consider the set of skills involved in creative writing.…”

Research on the cultivation strategy of critical thinking of medical doctoral students based on constructivism learning theory

“…The cultivation of top-notch innovative talents should be planned as soon as possible to promote the practical study of scientific research and the improvement of CT [6] . During the medical practice, medical staff can make the best decisions among all sorts of choice when they face with problems in complex situations [7] . In the national strategies of "innovation-driven development", medical doctoral students are the driving force of innovation and development.…”

The Value of Creativity for Enhancing Translational Ecologies, Insights, and Discoveries

“…As the research landscape continues to shift toward increasing complex interprofessional and multidisciplinary initiatives, scientists more than ever need to draw on creative thought processes not just to fuel discovery but to assemble and manage larger and more complicated collaborative relationships. It will be essential to incorporate scientific creativity in education and training programs for the next generation of scientists (DeHaan, 2009; Ness, 2011; Spoelstra et al, 2014; Foster and Lemus, 2015).…”