2003
DOI: 10.9774/gleaf.3062.2003.wi.00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing Value

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was consistent with the finding that SSCM was considered to be an operational expense in India [66]. It contrasts with the evidence, however, from SSCM initiatives in developed economies, where SSCM was found to reduce operating costs [68]. SSCM benefit analyses in developed countries included cost accounting [69], total cost of ownership [70], and sustainability assessment models [71].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This was consistent with the finding that SSCM was considered to be an operational expense in India [66]. It contrasts with the evidence, however, from SSCM initiatives in developed economies, where SSCM was found to reduce operating costs [68]. SSCM benefit analyses in developed countries included cost accounting [69], total cost of ownership [70], and sustainability assessment models [71].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The centerpiece of the triple bottom line approach is that it "pays to be green and socially responsible", at least in the long run [68]. However, there seems to be a narrow and short-term view on this in emerging and developing economies, where managers often perceive sustainable measures as costly [66].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such firms are seen to be innovative and opportunistic (Parker et al, 2009) as well as pro-active in obtaining the resources and capabilities they need to exploit environmentally relevant market opportunities (Collins et al, 2007;Roy and Thérin, 2008;Simpson et al, 2004). Parker et al (2009) consider businesses of this type as "advantage-driven SMEs" because they take environmental measures mainly to gain economic benefits such as reduced costs, increased revenues and enhanced reputation (Thorpe and Prakash-Mani, 2003), which can also enhance their competitiveness (Castka et al, 2004;Parry, 2012;Simpson et al, 2004;Studer et al, 2006). In contrast, some SMEs regard environmental improvement as a drain from their profits 384 IJEBR 24,2 (Revell and Blackburn, 2007;Simpson et al, 2004), which does not generate competitive advantage (Dahlmann et al, 2008).…”
Section: Economic Gains and Competitivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A growing number of studies emphasize the economic potential for MNCs tapping into developing country markets (see e.g. SustainAbility and International Finance Corporation 2002, Thorpe & Prakash‐Mani 2003, World Business Council on Sustainable Development 2004, Prahalad 2005, Warhurst 2005, Kirchgeorg & Winn 2006); especially, businesses operating in ‘emerging markets’ such as China, Brazil or India are increasingly exposed to CSR. In the case of South American businesses, Newell & Muro (2006: 57) note that ‘the degree of embeddedness within global markets emerges as perhaps the single most important driver of CSER behaviour.…”
Section: Csr and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%