2008
DOI: 10.1080/07380560802367761
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Developing Web 2.0 Tools for Support of Historical Inquiry in Social Studies

Abstract: Web 2.0 tools offer new possibilities for teaching and learning. PrimaryAccess is a Web 2.0 tool designed for K-12 history education. PrimaryAccess shares many of the characteristics of other Web 2.0 applications, but its educational focus makes it different from generic Web applications. Our work developing and researching PrimaryAccess has helped identify the tensions and opportunities for integrating Web 2.0 tools into K-12 instruction. Web 2.0 tool development and use are best explored in a disciplinary co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Access to the Internet meant access to information in general, and primary sources in particular. The use of historical evidence has been a part of established teaching practices for a long time (Barnes, 1896), but the growth of online multimedia databases (Bull, Hammond, & Ferster, 2008), "Digital history" or sourcing, made new and other types of evidence easily available. Through the development of structured, themed "packages," digitalized photographs, films, and primary documents made their way into social studies classrooms (Bisland, 2010;Clarke & Lee, 2004).…”
Section: Social Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Access to the Internet meant access to information in general, and primary sources in particular. The use of historical evidence has been a part of established teaching practices for a long time (Barnes, 1896), but the growth of online multimedia databases (Bull, Hammond, & Ferster, 2008), "Digital history" or sourcing, made new and other types of evidence easily available. Through the development of structured, themed "packages," digitalized photographs, films, and primary documents made their way into social studies classrooms (Bisland, 2010;Clarke & Lee, 2004).…”
Section: Social Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There can be many different ways of integrating technology in social studies (Heafner, 2004). Especially web 2.0 applications can be quite functional in technology integration into social studies courses (Bull et al, 2008;Holcomb & Beal, 2008). For this purpose, for example, social networks such as "Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Youtube" (Chong, & Xie, 2011), online assessment tools such as "Plickers Kahoot, Socrative and Quiziz" (Holcomb et al, 2011;Çelik, 2020) and Infographic design applications such as "Piktochart and Canva" (Gleason & von Gillern, 2018;Akbaba et al, 2019) can be used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As technology becomes more pervasive, the challenge for teachers to integrate technology into instruction is no longer based on the viability of technology-based learning but is shifted to a decision about when to use the technology and how to use it for more effective educational experiences (Neal & Miller, 2006). Recently, innovative webbased technologies and social networking tools (also called Web 2.0 tools) are applied to different teaching contexts by building student-teacher learning communities, sharing educational resources, and enhancing mutual communications that promote constructivist-based collaborative learning approaches (Bull, Hammond & Ferster, 2008;Purdy, 2010). With such approaches, students act as active learners to seek relevant resources, build cognitive artifacts, exchange information and feedback, and complete the assigned tasks collaboratively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%