2020
DOI: 10.1002/clc.23403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development a clinical prediction model of the neurological outcome for patients with coma and survived 24 hours after cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Abstract: Background Cardiac arrest is still a global public health problem at present. The neurological outcome is the core indicator of the prognosis of cardiac arrest. However, there is no effective means or tools to predict the neurological outcome of patients with coma and survived 24 hours after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Hypothesis Therefore, we expect to construct a prediction model to predict the neurological outcome for patients with coma and survived 24 hours after successful CPR. Methods… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,13,19 In those patients with underlying cardiac disease as a contributing factor to CA, survival seems more likely. 7,20 There is a lack of large-scale population data on the impact of CA after SAH on mortality, and the discharge dispositions of those who do survive. To date, our understanding of this clinical syndrome is primarily based on smaller cohort and database studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,13,19 In those patients with underlying cardiac disease as a contributing factor to CA, survival seems more likely. 7,20 There is a lack of large-scale population data on the impact of CA after SAH on mortality, and the discharge dispositions of those who do survive. To date, our understanding of this clinical syndrome is primarily based on smaller cohort and database studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The points in the nomogram represent single scores corresponding to different values. The total points can be obtained by summing up the individual points [ 26 ]. Patients were divided into high-risk groups and low-risk groups according to the cutoff value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The point in the figure represents a single score, and their single scores are added to obtain total points. 33 , 34 …”
Section: Nomogram Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%