2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development a validated highly sensitive LC–MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of Ledipasvir, sofosbuvir and its major metabolite GS-331007 in human plasma: Application to a human pharmacokinetic study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some analytical methods have been published for the estimation of SR and its metabolite, or in combination with other antiviral agents in biological samples [10,11,12]. One of these methods achieved a retention time of 3.5 min and achieved linear ranges of 5.0–2500 μg/L and 25–5000 μg/L for SF and GS331007, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some analytical methods have been published for the estimation of SR and its metabolite, or in combination with other antiviral agents in biological samples [10,11,12]. One of these methods achieved a retention time of 3.5 min and achieved linear ranges of 5.0–2500 μg/L and 25–5000 μg/L for SF and GS331007, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Due to its recent introduction in the market, few techniques were reported for LDS estimation including chromatographic, 6-9 spectrophotometric 10,11 and spectrouorimetric methods. [12][13][14] Although the reported chromatographic techniques are sensitive enough, [6][7][8] they are subject to extraction procedures as the plasma samples contain a high content of phospholipids as well as it requires expensive organic solvents and long operating time. 15 In addition, all the reported UV methods were restricted to the estimation of LDS in the tablets dosage only without extension to biological uids analysis due to their limited selectivity and sensitivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure of the SOF metabolite (GS‐331007) was similar in the presence and absence of DAC, while SOF exposures were ~35% higher in the presence of DAC (http://www.hcvdruginfo.ca/downloads/Hepatitis%20Cint_new%20NS5A%20inhibitors.pdf). The published methods for determination of SOF and/or DAC in human plasma are HPLC (Baker, El‐Kafrawy, Mahrous, & Belal, ; Hassib, Taha, Elkady, & Barakat, ; Nannetti et al, ; Srinivasu, Kumar, & Thirupathi, ), LC‐MS/MS (Abdallah, Abdel‐Megied, & Gouda, ; Ariaudo et al, ; Jiang et al, ; Nebsen & Elzanfaly, ; Qu, Wang, Zeng, Lub, & Yin, ; Rezk et al, , , b; Shi et al, ) and electrochemical detection (Azab & Fekry, ). To author's knowledge, this bio‐analytical method is the only LC‐MS/MS method for determination of SOF and DAC in human plasma with application to a pharmacokinetic study for both.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, NS5A has no known enzymatic functions and so it is difficult to understand its mode of action (Belema et al, 2014;Smith, Regal, & Mohammad, 2016; Figure 1). There are eight metabolites of DAC, one of which (BMS-805215) has some activity; however, it is 100-fold less potent than the parent drug (Product monograph, 2016 (Baker, El-Kafrawy, Mahrous, & Belal, 2017;Hassib, Taha, Elkady, & Barakat, 2017;Nannetti et al, 2017;Srinivasu, Kumar, & Thirupathi, 2016), LC-MS/MS (Abdallah, Abdel-Megied, & Gouda, 2017;Ariaudo et al, 2016;Jiang et al, 2015;Nebsen & Elzanfaly, 2016;Qu, Wang, Zeng, Lub, & Yin, 2015;Rezk et al, 2015Shi et al, 2015) and electrochemical detection (Azab & Fekry, 2017…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%