2012
DOI: 10.1017/s0031182012000406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and application of a delayed-release anthelmintic intra-ruminal bolus system for experimental manipulation of nematode worm burdens

Abstract: SUMMARYIn order to quantify the impact of parasites on host population dynamics, experimental manipulations that perturb the parasite-host relationship are needed but, logistically, this is difficult for wild hosts. Here, we describe the use of a delayed-release anthelmintic delivery system that can be administered when the hosts can be captured and its activity delayed until a more appropriate period in the host-parasite cycle. Our model system is Svalbard reindeer infected with a nematode parasite, Marshalla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each April from 2006 until 2011, all captured animals older than 12 months of age were randomly allocated to either the non‐treated control group or the anthelmintic treatment group. In the latter group, the anthelmintic was administered via a novel delayed‐release intra‐ruminal bolus (Carlsson, Wilson, & Irvine, ) which acted to remove nematodes at the start of winter (October) providing protection against re‐infection for around 4–5 weeks. After this period, animals became re‐infected with the nematode M. marshalli, but not O. gruehneri which is only transmitted in the summer months (Carlsson, Irvine, et al., ; Carlsson, Wilson, et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Each April from 2006 until 2011, all captured animals older than 12 months of age were randomly allocated to either the non‐treated control group or the anthelmintic treatment group. In the latter group, the anthelmintic was administered via a novel delayed‐release intra‐ruminal bolus (Carlsson, Wilson, & Irvine, ) which acted to remove nematodes at the start of winter (October) providing protection against re‐infection for around 4–5 weeks. After this period, animals became re‐infected with the nematode M. marshalli, but not O. gruehneri which is only transmitted in the summer months (Carlsson, Irvine, et al., ; Carlsson, Wilson, et al., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter group, the anthelmintic was administered via a novel delayed‐release intra‐ruminal bolus (Carlsson, Wilson, & Irvine, ) which acted to remove nematodes at the start of winter (October) providing protection against re‐infection for around 4–5 weeks. After this period, animals became re‐infected with the nematode M. marshalli, but not O. gruehneri which is only transmitted in the summer months (Carlsson, Irvine, et al., ; Carlsson, Wilson, et al., ). Animals receiving the delayed‐release intra‐ruminal bolus (DB) also received a single dose of short acting 1% moxidectin (Cydectin, Pfizer, UK) at 0.2 mg per kg live mass.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Over time, these factors can reduce any differences in parasite prevalence and intensity between treatment groups while increasing variance within treatment groups, thereby complicating inferences about treatment effects, especially when the study is conducted over a time span that exceeds the half‐life of the drug (Easterly et al, 1992 ; Ezenwa et al, 2010 ; Friant et al, 2016 ; Irvine et al, 2000 ; Knowles et al, 2013 ; Ranjan et al, 1997 ; Thomas & Morgan, 2013 ; Wahid et al, 1989 ). Therefore, extended‐release drug formulations have many advantages over traditional drug formulations that require frequent dosing to maintain their effectiveness against parasites (Carlsson et al, 2012 ; Ezenwa et al, 2010 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%