2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-006-9077-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and application of hybrid structure based method for efficient screening of ligands binding to G-protein coupled receptors

Abstract: G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise a large superfamily of proteins that are targets for nearly 50% of drugs in clinical use today. In the past, the use of structure-based drug design strategies to develop better drug candidates has been severely hampered due to the absence of the receptor's three-dimensional structure. However, with recent advances in molecular modeling techniques and better computing power, atomic level details of these receptors can be derived from computationally derived molecular… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even if the traditional handicap of lacking crystal structures of aminergic GPCRs has very recently been partially overcome [8,9], we still depend on the generation of homology-derived models to perform receptor based (RB) VS. ii) The multirreceptorial profile, responsible for the clinical efficacy of this type of drugs, [10] points out that one should in principle screen against a battery of receptors. Nevertheless, other alternative approaches have been proposed for the design of novel scaffolds for GPCR ligands with polipharmacology, which include hybrid structure based method [11], or a proper combination of physicochemical descriptors that characterize the binders of each considered receptor [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if the traditional handicap of lacking crystal structures of aminergic GPCRs has very recently been partially overcome [8,9], we still depend on the generation of homology-derived models to perform receptor based (RB) VS. ii) The multirreceptorial profile, responsible for the clinical efficacy of this type of drugs, [10] points out that one should in principle screen against a battery of receptors. Nevertheless, other alternative approaches have been proposed for the design of novel scaffolds for GPCR ligands with polipharmacology, which include hybrid structure based method [11], or a proper combination of physicochemical descriptors that characterize the binders of each considered receptor [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An iterative in silico-in vitro HSB method was employed for screening small molecules that inhibit the formation of the CA NTD-NTD interface (18). The protocol has been described in detail elsewhere (4,27,28).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical core analysis using clustering and principal-component analysis resulted in 300 molecules that were then docked to the binding site of CA-NTD using the GOLD program (Genetic Optimisation for Ligand Docking, version 4.1) (15). The docked receptor-ligand complexes were then scored using a customizable knowledge-based scoring function that is based on the nature of the interaction of every atom within the NTD-NTD docking pharmacophore (18). A consensus scoring scheme that involves GoldScore, ChemScore, contact score, and a shape-weighted scoring scheme (17) was then used to rank the compounds.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hybrid structure based method The HSB protocol, described in detail elsewhere [32], was employed for the virtual screening of nearly 3 million compounds to identify small-molecule inhibitors of T. gondii. The HSB procedure involved 4 major steps, namely: (1) construct a structural model of the T. gondii MTIP; (2) design the 3D pharmacophore based on the key molecular interactions between MyoA and MTIP in the complex; (3) screen the in-house molecular libraries to identify ''hits''; and (4) re-rank the hits using customized molecular docking and scoring schemes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%