2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.09.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and application of retention time prediction models in the suspect and non-target screening of emerging contaminants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
134
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
134
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These cut-points would then be used to filter unlikely candidates retrieved from the CFM-ID database. The use of additional supporting information, such as retention time predictions [30,31] and metadata source counts [20,32], has been shown to improve NTA identifications; incorporation of these data with CFM-ID ranking results could further improve candidate filtering, thus increasing the overall accuracy and performance of the workflow. Future investigations will aim to incorporate these various data streams into a unified workflow, and to optimize filtering criteria for maximum TPRs and minimum FPRs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These cut-points would then be used to filter unlikely candidates retrieved from the CFM-ID database. The use of additional supporting information, such as retention time predictions [30,31] and metadata source counts [20,32], has been shown to improve NTA identifications; incorporation of these data with CFM-ID ranking results could further improve candidate filtering, thus increasing the overall accuracy and performance of the workflow. Future investigations will aim to incorporate these various data streams into a unified workflow, and to optimize filtering criteria for maximum TPRs and minimum FPRs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly to in silico spectra prediction, the lack of experimental RT datasets has hampered the design of ML methods for large-scale RT prediction. Whereas community efforts now enable the access to thousands of MS/MS spectra 19 , RT predictions have been largely based on small datasets, often not publicly available, ranging from a few hundreds 2027 to less than 2200 2832 molecules. Large datasets containing peptide RT data exist 33 , but the only large-scale resource covering up to 114,000 unique small molecules is the commercial NIST retention index (relative RT) library.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, 371 compounds were retrieved from PubChem using a mass accuracy threshold of 5 ppm. Afterwards, the candidates were processed by MetFrag [ 52 ] and an in-house QSRR-based retention time prediction model that was developed by our group [ 55 ]. The most probable candidate was found to be catechol and the elucidated chemical structures of the fragments are given in Figure 4 b.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most probable candidate was found to be catechol and the elucidated chemical structures of the fragments are given in Figure 4 b. According to the degree of MEAN value (absolute values of mean of predictive residuals) in the Monte Carlo Sampling (MCS) plot [ 55 ], this candidate was not classified as a potential false positive ( Figure 4 c). The spectra of the reference standard of catechol was found in mzCloud database (mzCloud No: 2991) and the fragments matched the ones of the mass feature detected ( Figure 4 d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%