Development and application of ‘systems thinking’ principles for quality improvement

Abstract

Introduction‘Systems thinking’ is often recommended in healthcare to support quality and safety activities but a shared understanding of this concept and purposeful guidance on its application are limited. Healthcare systems have been described as complex where human adaptation to localised circumstances is often necessary to achieve success. Principles for managing and improving system safety developed by the European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation (EUROCONTROL; a European intergovernmental air navigation organisation) incorporate a ‘Safety-II systems approach’ to promote understanding of how safety may be achieved in complex work systems. We aimed to adapt and contextualise the core principles of this systems approach and demonstrate the application in a healthcare setting.MethodsThe original EUROCONTROL principles were adapted using consensus-building methods with front-line staff and national safety leaders.ResultsSix interrelated principles for healthcare were agreed. The foundation concept acknowledges that ‘most healthcare problems and solutions belong to the system’. Principle 1 outlines the need to seek multiple perspectives to understand system safety. Principle 2 prompts us to consider the influence of prevailing work conditions—demand, capacity, resources and constraints. Principle 3 stresses the importance of analysing interactions and work flow within the system. Principle 4 encourages us to attempt to understand why professional decisions made sense at the time and principle 5 prompts us to explore everyday work including the adjustments made to achieve success in changing system conditions.A case study is used to demonstrate the application in an analysis of a system and in the subsequent improvement intervention design.ConclusionsApplication of the adapted principles underpins, and is characteristic of, a holistic systems approach and may aid care team and organisational system understanding and improvement.

Transformational Change in maternity services in England: a longitudinal qualitative study of a national transformation programme ‘Early Adopter’

“…Systems thinking and practice has its own underlying theory and evidence-base, which did not feature prominently in the LST we studied. While some participants reported a move towards a systems perspective over time, our findings confirm those of others that suggest further efforts are required to embed it alongside more familiar organisational change practices [ 39 ]. Experience of past NHS change programmes offer limited insight into how to structure a system-level LST, which necessitated learning and adaptation over time.…”

Which human factors design issues are influencing system performance in out-of-hours community palliative care? Integration of realist approaches with an established systems analysis framework to develop mid-range programme theory

“…It is not intended to be a definitive explanation of all out-of-hours palliative care, rather we anticipate its usefulness being in providing a framework to guide quality improvement work that integrates person-level and other human factors-based systems thinking principles. 33 We expect, for example, this will help to support future attempts to improve out-of-hours palliative care, thereby increasing the likelihood of meaningful constructive change. This is because our mid-range theory highlights areas that are often overlooked in whole systems redesign.…”

Improving patient safety in two French hospitals: why teamwork training is not enough

“…However, as we observed, this does not correspond to the reality of hospital work and can at least partially explain why over the last two decades there has been a lack of sustained improvements following implementation of patient safety programs. Patient safety interventions focusing on single system elements rather than trying to understand interacting relationships and dependencies between people and other components of the system risk unintended consequences in other parts of the system (McNab et al , 2020).…”