1986
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459x.1986.tb00159.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Application of Texture Reference Scales

Abstract: Standard texture rating scales of hardness, adhesiveness, fracturability, cohesiveness, and denseness were modified during the training of a Texture Profile panel. New reference materials were selected for each scale to better illustrate the texture characteristics and intensities and to account for previously recommended food products no longer available. In addition, new reference scales for wetness, adhesiveness to lips, roughness, self‐adhesiveness, springiness, cohesiveness of mass, moisture absorption, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
89
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
89
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was recommended that when testing specific products the scale should be expanded in the intensity range covered by the test products. Experience gained in subsequent practical applications of these scales led to some modifications and development of additional scales described in a publication by Munoz (1986).…”
Section: Texture Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was recommended that when testing specific products the scale should be expanded in the intensity range covered by the test products. Experience gained in subsequent practical applications of these scales led to some modifications and development of additional scales described in a publication by Munoz (1986).…”
Section: Texture Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are also published references for scale values, especially in the evaluation of textural properties (e.g., Munoz, 1986).…”
Section: Descriptive Profiling/analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anchored reference standards, terminology definitions and evaluation techniques were agreed upon by the assessors during training and the formal training before evaluation (Szczesniak, 1963;Civille and Szczesniak, 1973;Muñoz, 1985;ISO 11036:1994;Tang et al, 1999).…”
Section: Sensory Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%