2002
DOI: 10.13182/nt02-a3316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Assessment of the Appendix K Version of RELAP5-3D for LOCA Licensing Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To generate a load spectrum for the LBLOCA while considering both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties, a two-step approach was adopted as elaborated in section 2. The first step is to generate a preliminary load spectrum by using RELAP5-3D/K (Liang, K.S., et al, 2002a) (Liang, K.S., et al, 2002b) to calculate the nominal conditional PCT (CPCT  ) for each sequence, and the second step is to account for the epistemic or calculation uncertainty of the preliminary load spectrum by using the DRHM methodology (Liang, K.S., 2011). In the DRHM methodology, conservative Appendix K models were adopted to cover model uncertainty, whereas realistic plant status parameters were used with statistical uncertainty analysis.…”
Section: Probabilistic Load Spectrum Of Lblocamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To generate a load spectrum for the LBLOCA while considering both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties, a two-step approach was adopted as elaborated in section 2. The first step is to generate a preliminary load spectrum by using RELAP5-3D/K (Liang, K.S., et al, 2002a) (Liang, K.S., et al, 2002b) to calculate the nominal conditional PCT (CPCT  ) for each sequence, and the second step is to account for the epistemic or calculation uncertainty of the preliminary load spectrum by using the DRHM methodology (Liang, K.S., 2011). In the DRHM methodology, conservative Appendix K models were adopted to cover model uncertainty, whereas realistic plant status parameters were used with statistical uncertainty analysis.…”
Section: Probabilistic Load Spectrum Of Lblocamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several important distinctions between the analyses of bounding events for the FHR based on current analysis, performance-based regulation goals and the historic conservative licensing of LWRs such as LOCA analysis under 10 CFR 50 Appendix K [71]. First, the analysis of FHR BDBEs should be based on best estimate plus uncertainty methods for the analysis of reactor transients [72], [73].…”
Section: Bounding Events Approach For Bdbesmentioning
confidence: 99%