2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2010.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and characterization of new nanoscaled ultrasound active lipid dispersions as contrast agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, AFM may lead to wider nanoparticles due to the tip broadening effect, which takes place when the tip is in contact with soft or sticky biomaterials (Luykx, Peters, Van Ruth, & Bouwmeester, 2008;Yang et al, 2007). However, other authors have published AFM images of nanoemulsions with good results (Mao et al, 2009;Marxer et al, 2011). Accordingly to our results, Preetz, Hauser, Hause, Kramer and Mäder (2010) have reported differences between droplet sizes of nanoemulsions and nanocapsules, since they found that the mean droplet size determined by DLS was 150 nm, whereas it ranged between 50 and 500 nm if they were observed by TEM or AFM.…”
Section: Tem and Afm Imagesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, AFM may lead to wider nanoparticles due to the tip broadening effect, which takes place when the tip is in contact with soft or sticky biomaterials (Luykx, Peters, Van Ruth, & Bouwmeester, 2008;Yang et al, 2007). However, other authors have published AFM images of nanoemulsions with good results (Mao et al, 2009;Marxer et al, 2011). Accordingly to our results, Preetz, Hauser, Hause, Kramer and Mäder (2010) have reported differences between droplet sizes of nanoemulsions and nanocapsules, since they found that the mean droplet size determined by DLS was 150 nm, whereas it ranged between 50 and 500 nm if they were observed by TEM or AFM.…”
Section: Tem and Afm Imagesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Good contrastenhanced effects have been observed in a number of reported studies, and phospholipid-shell and gas-core NBs have shown optimal contrast-enhancing abilities. [16][17][18][19] However, studies in vivo have focused on the contrast enhancement abilities of these agents in normal organs or tumors, not on the potential of NBs for the passive targeting of tumors. As a result, the purpose of this work was to fabricate nanosized, phospholipidshelled NBs with high ultrasonic-imaging efficiency and of a sufficiently small size to pass through the pores of tumor vasculature and achieve passive tumor targeting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanoscale ultrasound contrast agents with various shells (polymers or phospholipids) and cores (gas, liquid, or solid) have been fabricated and exhibit good contrast enhancement. Based on several in vitro [16][17][18][19] and in vivo 20 studies, phospholipid-shell and gas-core NBs have shown optimal contrast enhancement abilities. However, research on NBs is still in the initial stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UCAs have been reported as therapeutic agents for targeted or controlled drug/gene release. Marxer et al [54] developed a new kind of drug carriers with an average particle size of 200–300 nm based on different lipid formulations (DPPC/CH, DPPC/PEG40S, DSPC/PEG40S). Compared with the commercially available contrast agent SonoVue, the carriers exhibited adjustable properties such as small size, biocompatibility, good ultrasound reflectivity, high loading capacity, and long circulation (Figure 4(a)).…”
Section: Commonly Used Nanocarriers For Ultrasound-mediated Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the commercially available contrast agent SonoVue, the nanoscaled ultrasound active lipid dispersions showed good ultrasound reflectivity. (b) Visualization of diameters by atomic force microscopy [54, 55]. …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%