2023
DOI: 10.3390/v16010061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Clinical Performance of InteliSwab® COVID-19 Rapid Test: Evaluation of Antigen Test for the Diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 and Analytical Sensitivity to Detect Variants of Concern Including Omicron and Subvariants

Mark J. Fischl,
Janean Young,
Keith Kardos
et al.

Abstract: Background and objectives: Timely detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection with subsequent contact tracing and rapid isolation are considered critical to containing the pandemic, which continues with the emergence of new variants. Hence, there is an ongoing need for reliable point-of-care antigen rapid diagnostic tests (Ag-RDT). This report describes the development, evaluation, and analytical sensitivity of the diagnostic performance of the InteliSwab® COVID-19 Rapid Test. Methods: Samples from 165 symptomatic subje… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even ELISA assays developed using mAbs against N protein revealed a sensitivity and speci city of 70.72% (95% CI: 66.01-75.12) and 100% (95% CI: 97.57-100), respectively, regardless of Ct values and SARS-CoV-2 variants (Yadegari et al, 2023). Another study showed a clinical sensitivity and speci city of 85.2% (95% CI, 74.3-92.0%) and 98.1% (95% CI, 93.3-99.7%) respectively against real-time PCR (Fischl et al, 2024).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Even ELISA assays developed using mAbs against N protein revealed a sensitivity and speci city of 70.72% (95% CI: 66.01-75.12) and 100% (95% CI: 97.57-100), respectively, regardless of Ct values and SARS-CoV-2 variants (Yadegari et al, 2023). Another study showed a clinical sensitivity and speci city of 85.2% (95% CI, 74.3-92.0%) and 98.1% (95% CI, 93.3-99.7%) respectively against real-time PCR (Fischl et al, 2024).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%