2012
DOI: 10.1002/jbio.201200098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and comparative assessment of Raman spectroscopic classification algorithms for lesion discrimination in stereotactic breast biopsies with microcalcifications

Abstract: Microcalcifications are an early mammographic sign of breast cancer and a target for stereotactic breast needle biopsy. Here, we develop and compare different approaches for developing Raman classification algorithms to diagnose invasive and in situ breast cancer, fibrocystic change and fibroadenoma that can be associated with microcalcifications. In this study, Raman spectra were acquired from tissue cores obtained from fresh breast biopsies and analyzed using a constituent-based breast model. Diagnostic algo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we attribute the inaccuracies in classification (i.e., the ten false negatives from two cancerous sites) to spectroscopy-histopathology registration errors [29,30]. In other words, the spectroscopic measurements were potentially performed on a grossly normal site of the biopsied tissue whereas the histopathological results were obtained for a marginally different position on the tissue where cancerous cells could be observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we attribute the inaccuracies in classification (i.e., the ten false negatives from two cancerous sites) to spectroscopy-histopathology registration errors [29,30]. In other words, the spectroscopic measurements were potentially performed on a grossly normal site of the biopsied tissue whereas the histopathological results were obtained for a marginally different position on the tissue where cancerous cells could be observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(18) with an SVM algorithm developed for diagnosis of lesions irrespective of microcalcification status described in Dingari et al . (29). In the first step of this two-step naïve algorithm, LR was performed to first discriminate the entire dataset into three classes: normal breast tissue, lesions without microcalcifications and lesions with microcalcifications.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible approach is to combine the previous algorithm for microcalcification detection (18) with a new algorithm for diagnosis of breast lesions (irrespective of microcalcification status) (29), thereby constructing a sequential two-step algorithm to identify the breast lesion(s) associated with the microcalcifications. However, this is a laborious and unwieldy process (that also does not provide the required level of accuracy as detailed below), which can be simplified by devising a single algorithm to simultaneously detect microcalcifications and diagnose the associated breast lesion(s).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So, it is interesting to observe what happens to performance metrics like "sensitivity" and "specificity" as this threshold is varied from '0' to '1'. The ROC curves capture this behavior by plotting "sensitivity" against "FPR (1-specificity, which indicates false alarms)" for the different possible probability thresholds of a classification model [9,38,68,95]. It exhibits the tradeoff between "sensitivity" and "specificity" i.e.…”
Section: Receiver Operating Characteristics (Roc) Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%