2019
DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1560222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and content validity of new patient-reported outcome questionnaires to assess the signs and symptoms and impact of atopic dermatitis: the Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale (ADerm-SS) and the Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (ADerm-IS)

Abstract: Bodhani (2019) Development and content validity of new patient-reported outcome questionnaires to assess the signs and symptoms and impact of atopic dermatitis: the Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale (ADerm-SS) and the Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (ADerm-IS),

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From various pathophysiological perspectives, atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing inflammatory skin disease associated with pruritus and redness, typically on the face and the inside of elbows and knees [ 1 ]. Therefore, AD is closely connected to patients’ quality of life and comorbidities [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From various pathophysiological perspectives, atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic relapsing inflammatory skin disease associated with pruritus and redness, typically on the face and the inside of elbows and knees [ 1 ]. Therefore, AD is closely connected to patients’ quality of life and comorbidities [ 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They were recommended to be in category A. Among the 23 multidimensional instruments, 9 (39.1%) were category A (34,35,38,39,(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53)(54)(55)(56)(57), 6 (26.1%) category B (36,48,(58)(59)(60)(61)(62), and 8 (34.8%) were category C (37,39,46,51,54,(63)(64)(65)(66)(67)(68)(69)(70)(71)(72)(73)(74)(75)(76)(77)(78). None of the included multidimensional instruments has been proved to be sufficient in all of the assessed measurement properties.…”
Section: Psychometric Properties Of the Instruments Identifiedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to questionnaire development, a review of existing AD-specific instruments was conducted to determine whether there were any existing tools that could be implemented in a clinical trial for the assessment of symptoms and impacts of moderate to severe AD in adolescents and adults [ 5 ]. While AD-specific PRO questionnaires were developed and evaluated by other groups [ 6 10 ] [including the consensus group to harmonize core outcome measures for atopic eczema/dermatitis (HOME) [ 11 , 12 ]], none of the reviewed questionnaires met the criteria of the research team for the evaluation of daily and weekly symptoms and impacts in a clinical trial setting for the target patient population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, three novel PRO questionnaires for adolescents and adults with moderate to severe AD were developed on the basis of best measurement practices summarized in the US Food and Drug Administration’s 2009 PRO guidance [ 13 – 15 ]: Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (WP-NRS), Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale (ADerm-SS), and Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (ADerm-IS). Evidence of content validity [ 5 , 16 ], psychometric performance, and score interpretation guidance (e.g., meaningful within person change) [ 17 ] has been demonstrated in adolescents and adults with moderate to severe AD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation