2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.09.2937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Content Validity Testing of a Patient-Reported Treatment Acceptance Measure for Use in Patients Receiving Treatment via Subcutaneous Injection

Abstract: Successive rounds of in-depth interviews resulted in a treatment acceptance measure with strong content validity. Pending demonstration of its psychometric properties, the I-TAQ may prove to be a valuable measure of patients' perspectives toward being treated with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering therapies requiring subcutaneous injections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA also explores treatment acceptance through the I-TAQ, a patient-reported outcome measure [34]. Alirocumab requires patients to self-administer the medication via subcutaneous injections, a treatment strategy that has previously been rarely used in the management of hyperlipidaemia; therefore, understanding patients’ perspectives about using injection treatments versus oral medications is important but difficult to measure with existing methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA also explores treatment acceptance through the I-TAQ, a patient-reported outcome measure [34]. Alirocumab requires patients to self-administer the medication via subcutaneous injections, a treatment strategy that has previously been rarely used in the management of hyperlipidaemia; therefore, understanding patients’ perspectives about using injection treatments versus oral medications is important but difficult to measure with existing methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alirocumab requires patients to self-administer the medication via subcutaneous injections, a treatment strategy that has previously been rarely used in the management of hyperlipidaemia; therefore, understanding patients’ perspectives about using injection treatments versus oral medications is important but difficult to measure with existing methods. Based on previous data, the majority of study participants and physicians have considered the alirocumab pre-filled pen to be easy to use, and participants have shown a willingness to self-inject [50]; high rates of treatment adherence (~98%) have been reported with alirocumab [34]. Further information on treatment acceptance will be provided by DM-INSULIN, which investigates alirocumab in individuals being treated with insulin (and hence already familiar with self-injection) [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This may be a consequence of patients with DM being more accustomed to receiving injectable medications and/or performing blood glucose monitoring. The present ongoing study should provide more information on injection-site reactions in this population, while also exploring treatment acceptability by administration of the I-TAQ, a patient-reported outcome questionnaire specifically developed to investigate perspectives on treatment with LLTs requiring subcutaneous injections [25]. Based on previous data, most participants and physicians consider the alirocumab prefilled pen easy to use, and patients have shown a willingness to self-inject [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endpoints related to DM focus on changes from baseline in indices of glucose homoeostasis (HbA 1c and fasting plasma glucose), total daily insulin dose and the number of glucose-lowering agents. Treatment acceptability is assessed at weeks 8 and 24 in those who self-inject, using a 22-item validated patient-reported InjectionTreatment Acceptance Questionnaire (I-TAQ) [25]. Specifically, the I-TAQ assesses four domains of treatment acceptability: perceived efficacy (i.e.…”
Section: Endpoints and Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%