2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13204085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Demonstration of a Method for GEO-to-LEO NDVI Transformation

Abstract: This study presents a new method that mitigates biases between the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) from geostationary (GEO) and low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites for Earth observation. The method geometrically and spectrally transforms GEO NDVI into LEO-compatible GEO NDVI, in which GEO’s off-nadir view is adjusted to a near-nadir view. First, a GEO-to-LEO NDVI transformation equation is derived using a linear mixture model of anisotropic vegetation and nonvegetation endmember spectra. The coeffic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, because this direction (eastward or westward) differs substantially from the displacement direction of the GEO satellites (the same direction of the pixel position from the subsatellite point), data from the LEO satellites can compensate for the occlusion pixels of the GEO satellite images, which would be a great advantage of combining the data from both satellites. To facilitate such a compensation algorithm, techniques for comparing the data between GEO and LEO sensors need to be established, especially for targets located in middle-latitude mountainous regions, which is considered a challenging task [48][49][50]. Comparisons between GEO and LEO sensors are a far more complicated issue than are comparisons between orthorectified data and original (before rectification) data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, because this direction (eastward or westward) differs substantially from the displacement direction of the GEO satellites (the same direction of the pixel position from the subsatellite point), data from the LEO satellites can compensate for the occlusion pixels of the GEO satellite images, which would be a great advantage of combining the data from both satellites. To facilitate such a compensation algorithm, techniques for comparing the data between GEO and LEO sensors need to be established, especially for targets located in middle-latitude mountainous regions, which is considered a challenging task [48][49][50]. Comparisons between GEO and LEO sensors are a far more complicated issue than are comparisons between orthorectified data and original (before rectification) data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The multi-sensor NDVI inconsistencies are mainly from the differences in the following: orbital overpass times [35], geometric, spectral, and radiometric calibration errors [36][37][38][39], and directional sampling and scanning systems [40]. Satellite-based NDVI may be more complicated due to the varying sun-target sensor geometries [41,42]. The difference in the relative spectral response functions of the different sensors (such as Landsat-TM and Terra-MODIS) can cause the inconsistency in NDVI [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect is comparable in magnitude to the uncertainties caused by sensor calibration, atmospheric, and angular correction and can lead to systematic biases if neglected [44]. To reduce these differences, Obata et al (2021) [41] developed an NDVI transformation method based on a linear mixture model of anisotropic vegetation and non-vegetation endmember spectra, which can reduce the effects of surface anisotropy caused by viewing angle differences and spectral response function differences at the scene level. Wang and Huang (2017) [45] constructed a linear model to correct the temporal change in coarse images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%