2011 Aerospace Conference 2011
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2011.5747525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and demonstration of an autonomous collision avoidance algorithm aboard the ISS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their results, the error obtained was only 10 cm after temporal propagation simulations of 5 days, while the SGP4 model [10] (maintained by the US Space Command -NORAD) obtained an error of 30 meters under the same conditions. The OMOP analytical model [11] (with equations that can be applied for short and long propagation times) obtained an error of 300 cm and the Abdel-Aziz propagator in [12] obtained an error of 100 cm under the same conditions. In implementing collision avoidance maneuvers, the propulsion system must modify the vehicle's speed for three simultaneous objectives: 1) to avoid a collision;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In their results, the error obtained was only 10 cm after temporal propagation simulations of 5 days, while the SGP4 model [10] (maintained by the US Space Command -NORAD) obtained an error of 30 meters under the same conditions. The OMOP analytical model [11] (with equations that can be applied for short and long propagation times) obtained an error of 300 cm and the Abdel-Aziz propagator in [12] obtained an error of 100 cm under the same conditions. In implementing collision avoidance maneuvers, the propulsion system must modify the vehicle's speed for three simultaneous objectives: 1) to avoid a collision;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The following tests evaluated the interaction between a human‐controlled spacecraft and autonomous collision avoidance mechanisms. This section briefly describes the collision avoidance steering law (Katz, Saenz‐Otero, & Miller, 2011). It operates on the closest point of approach (CPA), defined as the point in space and time in a relative trajectory when two objects are closest.…”
Section: Experiments Aboard the International Space Stationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main benefit of this simplicity is that, if implemented correctly, this algorithm can have very low computational cost. As a result, it can run as a higher-frequency background control process, ensuring safe relative positioning, while more complicated mapping and planning algorithms (e.g., those found in [12][13][14][15][16][17]) are being run ahead of close proximity and docking operations. Alternatively, this relative navigation and control system can be used with a very low power embedded computer (possibly on a very small satellite) to perform an inspection mission at a safe keepout distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%