2008
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01858-07
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Evaluation of a Novel Multiplex PCR Technology for Molecular Differential Detection of Bacterial Respiratory Disease Pathogens

Abstract: The ResPlex I assay (Qiagen) was designed to amplify and detect DNA of six bacterial respiratory pathogens. This assay was compared with real-time PCR assays based upon the same target sequences for the ability detect the target bacteria by use of both stock strains and specimens from respiratory disease patients. The ResPlex I assay is somewhat less sensitive than real-time PCR assays but offers the advantage of multiple assays in a single reaction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clinicians resort to empiric antibiotics up front and often arbitrary continuation or de-escalation of antibiotics subsequently, resulting in antibiotic abuse and the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria [2,7,8,24]. Greater use of PCR amplification for bacteria may allow more precise antibiotic prescription, and routine use of multiplex PCR kits for viruses [8,20,45,46,47,48] could provide answers regarding aetiology. However, as specific treatments such as antivirals for respiratory viruses other than influenza do not yet exist, the true utility of these PCR kits remains unclear [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinicians resort to empiric antibiotics up front and often arbitrary continuation or de-escalation of antibiotics subsequently, resulting in antibiotic abuse and the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria [2,7,8,24]. Greater use of PCR amplification for bacteria may allow more precise antibiotic prescription, and routine use of multiplex PCR kits for viruses [8,20,45,46,47,48] could provide answers regarding aetiology. However, as specific treatments such as antivirals for respiratory viruses other than influenza do not yet exist, the true utility of these PCR kits remains unclear [10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…115 Another commercially available BBMA e has been used for the detection of 6 respiratory bacterial pathogens including Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, encapsulated or nonencapsulated Haemophilus influenzae, Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Chlamydia pneumoniae. Although this assay had less sensitivity when compared to real-time PCR, it was useful for surveillance purposes 15 and, when combined with a commercial assay including viral respiratory pathogens f for a 21-plex assay, significant coinfection rates could be established. 22,25 In-house developed assays have also been used 97,98 to detect Norovirus, Rotavirus, and Sapovirus species, as well as astroviruses and adenoviruses from feces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this conventional method is time consuming, laborious, and less sensitive [4, 5]. There are a lot of factors that may influence the culture results, including antimicrobial treatment, prolonged transportation time, and inappropriate transportation medium [5, 6]. Due to these limitations, the need to utilize more sensitive methods such as multiplex PCR, real-time PCR, and microarray assays are now greatly increased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%