In this issue of Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology is an important paper by Biel and colleagues, 1 which explores the relationship between maternal body mass index (BMI), the use of regional anaesthesia and complications arising from regional anaesthesia in maternity care. In this study, set in California, USA, 53.6% of 90 369 normal weight primiparous women and 62.1% of 3706 super obese (BMI ≥ 50 kg/m 2 ) women had regional analgesia. These rates are moderate to high relative to those reported globally (as low as 18% in parts of Australia 2 up to 87% reported in France 3 ). The results of this study reflect a whole range of factors that uniquely influence local clinical anaesthetic and obstetrical practice, and the findings should be considered in geographical context.A novel aspect to this paper is the attempt to explore the association between BMI and the incidence of complications of regional anaesthesia. This is of interest to childbearing women, and the midwives, obstetricians and anaesthetists who care for them. The complications of neuraxial anaesthesia in obstetrical care range from mild complications that occur frequently (e.g. hypotension 1 in 50, or 2%) to severe complications that occur rarely (e.g. epidural haematoma 1 in 170 000). 4,5 Large cohort studies such as this one, are the only way to detect such infrequent adverse events. Although the results presented in this paper may be subject to the limitations of clinical coding, to date, this is the first cohort (with 1 815 087 pregnancies), to examine the influence of BMI on rare but extremely serious complications. 4-7 The authors report that the incidence of complications was greater in women with BMI (kg/m 2 ) for both primiparous women (odds ratio [OR] 2.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37, 4.02) and multiparous women (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.26, 3.16). Future work will be required to build on these results, using clinically relevant and accurate outcome definitions and distinguishing between neuraxial needle types and sizes.The authors report that women with class III obesity were more likely to have regional anaesthesia, with 60.9% of primiparous women with BMI 40-49.9 kg/m 2 receiving epidural analgesia. The significance of this is complex, and likely to be influenced by the practice patterns of the treating anaesthetists, the epidural usage rate in the underlying population, obstetrical, maternal and fetal indications for regional anaesthesia, and preferences of treating obstetricians. 8 Practice guidelines internationally refer to the early insertion of epidurals in women with BMI >40 kg/m 2 , 9-11 a practice which is supported by expert opinion 12,13 and known to be adopted by anaesthetists in Australia. 14 If treating anaesthetists adhere to this practice suggestion, it is not surprising to see this result. In contrast, overweight and obese women had a lower rate of regional anaesthesia than women with normal weight with an increased risk of complications seen only in those with class III obesity. More nuanced exploration is needed to un...