“…Compared to a standard PCR protocol, LAMP requires a single bath at a constant temperature instead of a thermal cycler. The performances of LAMP-and PCR-based diagnostic systems, including real-time technologies (23,40), have been extensively compared. In general, LAMP was found to be either similar or superior to PCR, and more specific (e.g., 8,13,15), but a few studies proved otherwise, such as those reported by Kato et al (18), who showed that although LAMP was 10-fold more sensitive than standard PCR for the detection of the Clostridium difficile toxin B gene (tcdB), an optimized nested-PCR assay performed much better than LAMP.…”