2019
DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2018.1518836
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Evaluation of a Pilot Overdose Education and Naloxone Distribution Program for Hospitalized General Medical Patients

Abstract: Background Overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) to people at risk of witnessing or experiencing an opioid overdose has traditionally been provided through harm reduction agencies. Expanding OEND to inpatient general medical settings may reach at-risk individuals who do not access harm reduction services and have not been trained. An OEND program targeting inpatients was developed, piloted, and evaluated on two general medicine floors at Montefiore Medical Center, a large urban academic medical c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other health systems have created programs intended to increase naloxone co‐prescribing and distribution. These programs have relied on providers or other users to identify patients who would benefit from naloxone and reach out to additional resources through the use of chart review by pharmacists or via clinical dashboard review 15‐17 . One organization reported the use of an inline alert to encourage co‐prescribing of naloxone but did not report on the efficacy of this intervention 16 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other health systems have created programs intended to increase naloxone co‐prescribing and distribution. These programs have relied on providers or other users to identify patients who would benefit from naloxone and reach out to additional resources through the use of chart review by pharmacists or via clinical dashboard review 15‐17 . One organization reported the use of an inline alert to encourage co‐prescribing of naloxone but did not report on the efficacy of this intervention 16 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the second statewide, interhospital network ED take‐home naloxone rescue kit program developed in the United States 29 . Hospital collaborations between pharmacists, physicians, and nurses have been successful in creating naloxone programs in ED, 22 other outpatient, 30 and inpatient programs 31 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Hospital collaborations between pharmacists, physicians, and nurses have been successful in creating naloxone programs in ED, 22 other outpatient, 30 and inpatient programs. 31 We were able to successfully leverage expertise in opioid harm reduction, quality improvement, and internetwork ED collaboration to create a successful pilot project that has distributed nearly 900 naloxone rescue kits to ED patients at risk of opioid overdose in its first year.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pilot study developed a four-step program for OEND at The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) that focused on identifying target populations, garnering support, training staff members, and implementation ( Peckham and Boggs, 2016 ). Inpatient medical OEND integration was explored in another pilot study that enrolled newly admitted patients who had used opioids in the year before admission, exposed them to a short training video, and gave them a take-home naloxone supply ( Jakubowski et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Background and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pilot study examining OEND among hospital inpatients also described limited hospitalization times as a barrier to effectively training all inpatients. Furthermore, they proposed expanding the classification of opioid-related events as a universal assessment rather than targeting only those admitted with opioid-related diagnoses to broaden the eligible pool of participants ( Jakubowski et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Background and Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%