2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and evaluation of a real-time EBOV-L-RT-qPCR for detection of Zaire ebolavirus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all the assays, two vials of each standard were reconstituted using 1 mL of molecular grade water, and viral RNA was extracted using commercially available kits. In-house assays were developed using published primers and probe sequences for the Ebola virus np gene [ 10 ] and l gene [ 18 ]. Ten-fold serial dilutions of the high concentration standards showed good efficiencies and linearity of the qRT-PCR for both targets ( Fig 2A and 2B ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all the assays, two vials of each standard were reconstituted using 1 mL of molecular grade water, and viral RNA was extracted using commercially available kits. In-house assays were developed using published primers and probe sequences for the Ebola virus np gene [ 10 ] and l gene [ 18 ]. Ten-fold serial dilutions of the high concentration standards showed good efficiencies and linearity of the qRT-PCR for both targets ( Fig 2A and 2B ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a growing number of molecular tests described in the literature. The tests that were selected in this study have been widely used not only in epidemic situations but also in external quality assessment studies [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Dual-target assays are increasingly used in commercial and in-house assays [6,[21][22][23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total RNA was extracted using Direct-Zol RNA columns (Zymo Research Corp), and cDNA transcribed using Superscript III (Invitrogen). Samples were screened for filoviruses using four assays: 1) a nested filovirus ‘family level’ consensus PCR (cPCR) targeting a 680 bp fragment of the filovirus L gene [ 9 ], 2) an Ebolavirus ‘genus level’ cPCR targeting a 187 bp fragment of the NP gene [ 19 ], 3) a real-time PCR specific for the EBOV virus, targeting the L-gene [ 20 ], and 4) a real-time PCR specific for the BOMV virus, targeting the L-gene [ 9 ]. Samples were also screened using broadly reactive cPCR assays for corona [ 21 , 22 ], paramyxo [ 23 ], flavi [ 24 ], and influenza [ 25 ] viruses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%