2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and evaluation of an elective course that incorporates a standard medication therapy management certificate program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examples of metrics that were used to study the academic performance were average final course scores, 20,[25][26][27] a range of final course scores, 28,29 , average student scores on various course assessments such as examinations, 20-22, 24-26, 30, 31 quizzes, 20,23,32,33 or other assignments. 20,26,27,33,34 In a few cases where the course intervention was limited to a certain part of the course the metric used to assess academic performance was not the entire assessment but the score on a group of questions that were related to the intervention. 19,23,30 Final course letter grades 20,21,25 and the number or percentage of students who passed or failed examinations 21,22,31 were also used as metrics for academic performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Examples of metrics that were used to study the academic performance were average final course scores, 20,[25][26][27] a range of final course scores, 28,29 , average student scores on various course assessments such as examinations, 20-22, 24-26, 30, 31 quizzes, 20,23,32,33 or other assignments. 20,26,27,33,34 In a few cases where the course intervention was limited to a certain part of the course the metric used to assess academic performance was not the entire assessment but the score on a group of questions that were related to the intervention. 19,23,30 Final course letter grades 20,21,25 and the number or percentage of students who passed or failed examinations 21,22,31 were also used as metrics for academic performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,15,16 Frequently, the description of survey results included the survey questions and student responses. 12,15,18,23,27,[31][32][33][34][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] Depending on the research question there may be a need to administer a pre-and a postsurvey. This may be particularly important when the survey measures changes from a baseline prior to the intervention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To our knowledge, this is the first study in which medication review competency is self-assessed by undergraduate pharmacy students using nationally defined competencies as a reference. Previous studies in relation to this topic come mostly from the United States and have focused on assessing the impact of single medication review-related courses on students’ competency [ 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. Instead of concentrating on one course, our study focused on the competencies fostered in a 3-year pharmacy curriculum that was recently reformed, with one of the added learning outcomes targeting medication reviews.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These four papers tested the use of feedback in three different areas: improving CPR skills development [14]; subjective, objective, assessment, and plan (SOAP) note writing [15]; and student performance on verbal competency and patient counseling and interviewing assessments [16,17]. The other studies' feedback focus areas were patient communication including counseling and other simulated patient interactions [18][19][20][21][22]; patient work up including SOAP notes [18,[23][24][25][26][27][28] or oral case presentations and care plans [26,[29][30][31]; and other topics such as evidence appraisal and research skills [32,33]; self-assessments [34]; disease information [35]; pharmacy calculations [36]; and pharmacology experiments [37]. Eleven of the 12 major theory talk articles assessed the impact of feedback on student learning.…”
Section: Didactic Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%