2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10972-005-4585-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Evaluation of an Inquiry-Based Elementary Science Teacher Education Program Reflecting Current Reform Movements

Abstract: and various other national and state documents call for teachers who possess science content knowledge, employ an inquiry approach in teaching, and engage in reflective practices. This paper describes a rationale for choosing particular recommendations to implement and how we incorporated those as we revised our elementary science education program. An analysis of the impact of the reformed inquiry-based content courses revealed that students who take more than one reformed content course improve their science… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies on science professional development programs provide important insights into aspects such as designing appropriate lessons, adopting effective teaching methods, following particular instructional activities, and evaluating student learning (e.g., Akerson & Hanuscin, 2007;Luera & Otto, 2005). However, one limitation of these programs is that they often overlook the social dimension of science teaching (Oliveira, 2009;Oliveira, 2010) and the integration into instruction (e.g., Borko, 2004;Clarke & Hollingsworth, 2002;Yilmaz-Tuzun, 2008).…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on science professional development programs provide important insights into aspects such as designing appropriate lessons, adopting effective teaching methods, following particular instructional activities, and evaluating student learning (e.g., Akerson & Hanuscin, 2007;Luera & Otto, 2005). However, one limitation of these programs is that they often overlook the social dimension of science teaching (Oliveira, 2009;Oliveira, 2010) and the integration into instruction (e.g., Borko, 2004;Clarke & Hollingsworth, 2002;Yilmaz-Tuzun, 2008).…”
Section: Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers of Physical Sciences are expected to possess a sound knowledge of concepts about the periodic trends of physical properties of elements. From a constructivist perspective, teachers facilitate the learning process and guide students in their meaning making (Luera & Otto, 2005).…”
Section: Contribution Of This Paper To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a theory of knowledge and learning, social constructivism views the teaching and learning context, students' prior knowledge and the interaction between student and the context as vital in informing teacher practice (Luera & Otto, 2005). Social constructivists believe that knowledge is a human product, and is socially and culturally constructed (Gredler, 2008).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Illustrating the five components of Tillotson's approach, pre-service elementary teachers develop and analyze pre-assessments of K-8 student knowledge about a specific science topic to identify prior student understanding; they create and teach two lessons to provide applicable scientific content, post-assess to determine the impact of their teaching and write a research journal style report describing their project. The AR assignment is more structured than a typical action research project in order to support the pre-service teachers, many whom have never conducted a literature review, created assessments linked to research, or completed an AR project (Luera & Otto, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%