2023
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.3c01617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Predicting Instantaneous Mass Flow Rates of Biomass Fast Pyrolysis in Bubbling Fluidized Beds

Abstract: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has evolved into a vital tool for advancing bubbling fluidized-bed reactors for biomass fast pyrolysis. However, due to the enormous computational burden of CFD simulations, optimizing working parameters over a broad range or simulating large/industrial units is still extremely time-consuming. Because deep learning (DL) is a promising method to attain both precision and speed, two new DL models, which added an attention mechanism or a convolutional neuron network (CNN) layer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the employed MFM, variable particle density and diameter were considered. , The gas–solid and solid–solid drag coefficients were computed using the drag models introduced by Huilin and Gidaspow and Syamlal, respectively. Moreover, the pyrolysis reaction kinetics is a modified version of the Shafizadeh–Chin mechanism. , The real-time particle size was determined using a particle shrinkage model based on mass conservation at the particle scale. , The physical properties and basic simulation conditions are consistent with those from our previous work, as shown in Table S2. The CFD simulation was performed for 100 s, and the predicted and experimental product yields are summarized in Table S3.…”
Section: Data Set From Cfd Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the employed MFM, variable particle density and diameter were considered. , The gas–solid and solid–solid drag coefficients were computed using the drag models introduced by Huilin and Gidaspow and Syamlal, respectively. Moreover, the pyrolysis reaction kinetics is a modified version of the Shafizadeh–Chin mechanism. , The real-time particle size was determined using a particle shrinkage model based on mass conservation at the particle scale. , The physical properties and basic simulation conditions are consistent with those from our previous work, as shown in Table S2. The CFD simulation was performed for 100 s, and the predicted and experimental product yields are summarized in Table S3.…”
Section: Data Set From Cfd Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our group has made some preliminary attempts in this area have been made by our group and has achieved promising results. Zhong et al employed a long short-term memory (LSTM) model to forecast the mass flow rates at the outlet of a bubbling fluidized bed reactor, further incorporating attention mechanisms and convolutional neural networks (CNN) . With an equivalent workload, CFD simulations require 18 h of computation, while the trained ML models can make predictions in less than 4 min.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Du et al 30 used ANN to couple the EMMS drag modeling to explore the multivariate relationship involving multiple parameters in the drag correction process. Zhong et al 31 developed a deep learning (DL) model with CFD simulations to efficiently predict spatiotemporal distributions of quantities of each phase in a bubbling biomass fluidized pyrolyzer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning (DL) is a promising method to attain both precision and speed. Zhong et al established two new DL models to predict instantaneous mass flow rates of major species for biomass fast pyrolysis in a bubbling fluidized bed. Furthermore, Zhang et al investigated biochar for postcombustion carbon capture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%